Skip to content

Conversation

@yaooqinn
Copy link
Member

@yaooqinn yaooqinn commented Feb 14, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix style issue in the k8s document, please go to http://spark.apache.org/docs/3.0.0-preview2/running-on-kubernetes.html and search the keywordspark.kubernetes.file.upload.path to jump to the error context

Why are the changes needed?

doc correctness

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Nah

How was this patch tested?

Nah

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Test build #118431 has finished for PR 27582 at commit 2414738.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23188/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23188/

@yaooqinn
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

Copy link
Contributor

@attilapiros attilapiros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was about to open a PR with the same html escaping :)

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Test build #118436 has finished for PR 27582 at commit 2414738.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23193/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23193/

@yaooqinn
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 15, 2020

Test build #118473 has finished for PR 27582 at commit 2414738.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 15, 2020

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23230/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 15, 2020

Kubernetes integration test status success
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/23230/

HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix style issue in the k8s document, please go to http://spark.apache.org/docs/3.0.0-preview2/running-on-kubernetes.html and search the keyword`spark.kubernetes.file.upload.path` to jump to the error context

### Why are the changes needed?

doc correctness

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Nah
### How was this patch tested?

Nah

Closes #27582 from yaooqinn/k8s-doc.

Authored-by: Kent Yao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0353cbf)
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master and branch-3.0.

sjincho pushed a commit to sjincho/spark that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix style issue in the k8s document, please go to http://spark.apache.org/docs/3.0.0-preview2/running-on-kubernetes.html and search the keyword`spark.kubernetes.file.upload.path` to jump to the error context

### Why are the changes needed?

doc correctness

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Nah
### How was this patch tested?

Nah

Closes apache#27582 from yaooqinn/k8s-doc.

Authored-by: Kent Yao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants