[SPARK-27880][SQL] Add bool_and for every and bool_or for any as function aliases

[yaooqinn]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

bool_or(x) <=> any/some(x) <=> max(x)
bool_and(x) <=> every(x) <=> min(x)
Args:
x: boolean

Why are the changes needed?

PostgreSQL, Presto and Vertica, etc also support this feature:

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

add new functions support

How was this patch tested?

add ut

[SparkQA]

Test build #112103 has finished for PR 26126 at commit 1e32603.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
• case class BoolOr(arg: Expression) extends UnevaluableBooleanAggBase(arg)
• case class BoolAnd(arg: Expression) extends UnevaluableBooleanAggBase(arg)

[yaooqinn]

cc @wangyum @cloud-fan @gatorsmile

[cloud-fan]

is bool_and just an alias of every? If so we can do expression[EveryAgg]("bool_and")

[yaooqinn]

Yes, it is. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26126/files#diff-fdccd9945d709da6c561b67a2e46a0d8R296, is there a way to keep the bool_and string in the schema?

[cloud-fan]

We don't need to keep the function alias in the schema. There are many examples in FunctionRegistry, that a function has more than one name and we always use one name when displaying.

[yaooqinn]

I see. Then any, some and bool_or are mathematically equivalent, I guess we can only left AnyAgg and remove other implemtations

[cloud-fan]

Can we make the title more explicit that this just adds function alias?

[SparkQA]

Test build #112142 has finished for PR 26126 at commit 0a09742.

• This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[yaooqinn]

retest this please

[wangyum]

We should enable these tests: aggregates_part2.sql#L116-L160 and udf-aggregates_part2.sql#L118-L162. Are we doing this in this PR or in the follow-up PR?

[SparkQA]

Test build #112145 has finished for PR 26126 at commit 0a09742.

• This patch fails Spark unit tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[yaooqinn]

@wangyum thanks for noticing. But why these same tests in two different test files?

[SparkQA]

Test build #112160 has finished for PR 26126 at commit ce32134.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[SparkQA]

Test build #112162 has finished for PR 26126 at commit 547c524.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[cloud-fan]

thanks, merging to master!