Skip to content

Conversation

@sev7e0
Copy link
Contributor

@sev7e0 sev7e0 commented Sep 25, 2019

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove unnecessary imports in core module.

Why are the changes needed?

Clean code for Apache Spark 3.0.0.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Local test.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Hi, @sev7e0 . We usually do module-by-module for this kind of task. Could you find more in core module?

@sev7e0
Copy link
Contributor Author

sev7e0 commented Sep 26, 2019

Thanks for your comment. I will try to check the rest of core. @dongjoon-hyun

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thank you, @sev7e0 . You can use IntelliJ feature.

@sev7e0
Copy link
Contributor Author

sev7e0 commented Sep 26, 2019

Hi, @dongjoon-hyun . I have checked the imports in all the files in core and optimized them. Please review. Thank you!

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-29246][CORE][TEST] Remove unnecessary imports in CoarseGrainedExecutorBackendSuite [SPARK-29246][CORE] Remove unnecessary imports in core module Sep 26, 2019
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

ok to test

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. (Pending Jenkins).

Thank you so much, @sev7e0 ! Although GitHub Action already verified the compilation, we had better pass the Jenkins testing. I'll merge this after test completion.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 27, 2019

Test build #111455 has finished for PR 25927 at commit 4675e62.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@sev7e0
Copy link
Contributor Author

sev7e0 commented Sep 27, 2019

Ok. Thank you, @dongjoon-hyun and @maropu

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thank you, @sev7e0 and @maropu .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants