Skip to content

Conversation

@mgaido91
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR addresses the comment in the previous one. outputOrdering becomes a field of InMemoryRelation.

How was this patch tested?

existing UTs

@mgaido91
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 15, 2018

Test build #97392 has finished for PR 22726 at commit b74f4d5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! For such a refactoring, I am unable to merge this to the 2.4 branch.

LGTM

Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 56247c1 Oct 15, 2018
jackylee-ch pushed a commit to jackylee-ch/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
…nMemoryRelation

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR addresses [the comment](apache#22715 (comment)) in the previous one. `outputOrdering` becomes a field of `InMemoryRelation`.

## How was this patch tested?

existing UTs

Closes apache#22726 from mgaido91/SPARK-25727_followup.

Authored-by: Marco Gaido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants