Skip to content

Conversation

@srowen
Copy link
Member

@srowen srowen commented May 11, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

…sary or probably resulting in more complex code
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 11, 2017

Test build #76798 has finished for PR 17949 at commit 104b604.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member Author

srowen commented May 12, 2017

Merged to master/2.2

@asfgit asfgit closed this in fc8a2b6 May 12, 2017
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes #17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554.

(cherry picked from commit fc8a2b6)
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
@srowen srowen deleted the SPARK-20554 branch May 15, 2017 06:50
robert3005 pushed a commit to palantir/spark that referenced this pull request May 19, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554.
liyichao pushed a commit to liyichao/spark that referenced this pull request May 24, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants