Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Aug 5, 2014

This should improve test runtime because majority of the test runtime are scheduling and task overheads.

This should improve test runtime because majority of the test runtime are scheduling and task overheads.
@concretevitamin
Copy link
Contributor

Can we reset the original value in afterAll()? There's a test in SQLConfSuite that depends on that option, and in the future people might easily add tests that uses the param as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another more robust way to do this would be to override the default value in TestHive itself. This way the value wouldn't be thrown away by tests that call clear()

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

Mind closing this in favor of #2164?

@rxin rxin closed this Aug 27, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants