-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-20265][MLlib] Improve Prefix'span pre-processing efficiency #17575
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7af4945
[SPARK-20265][MLlib] Improve Prefix'span pre-processing efficiency
Syrux 8e5db6a
Separating cleaning methods in standalone methods + Tests for cleanin…
Syrux 47bd983
Small corrections, done as requested
Syrux 25ece47
I had forgotten a four space indent, fixed it
Syrux 627bfe0
Changing to itemsets.foreach(set => uniqItems ++= set)
Syrux d799d46
Small changes in code style
Syrux File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the same as checking
allItems.size > 1now, rather than maintain a flag?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but allItems is an arrayBuilder, so there is no size method.
I could change it to "if(allIItems.result().size > 1)" but I think the performance might be worse than a flag. If you still want me to change it, I will make a new commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. What about waiting to pre-pend the initial 0 until the end, only if not empty?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure about the performance of a prepend on arrayBuilder. I will check them first. Back in a few minutes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently, prepending is impossible on an arrayBuilder. The method doesn't exist (http://www.scala-lang.org/api/2.12.0/scala/collection/mutable/ArrayBuilder.html).
I think the flag is our best bet for performance. Changing it to an arrayBuffer would be far worse since a type encapsulation would be forced on the ints it contain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK no problem, leave it. Just riffing while we're editing the code.