Skip to content

[SPARK-2806] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10 #1702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-2806] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10 #1702

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@avati
Copy link
Contributor

@avati avati commented Jul 31, 2014

Scala 2.11 packages not available for the current version (3.2.6)

Signed-off-by: Anand Avati [email protected]

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

AmplabJenkins commented Jul 31, 2014

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Member

ScrapCodes commented Aug 1, 2014

LGTM, if jenkins build succeeds.

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Member

ScrapCodes commented Aug 1, 2014

test this please

@avati avati changed the title [SPARK-1812] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10 [SPARK-2806] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10 Aug 2, 2014
@avati
Copy link
Contributor Author

avati commented Aug 4, 2014

PING

Any update on this PR?

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Aug 4, 2014

Jenkins, test this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 4, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1702. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17856/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 4, 2014

QA results for PR 1702:
- This patch FAILED unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17856/consoleFull

@avati
Copy link
Contributor Author

avati commented Aug 4, 2014

It is not clear how the failure is related to this patch..?

@avati
Copy link
Contributor Author

avati commented Aug 5, 2014

ping.

Looks like a retest is needed here?

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Aug 5, 2014

Jenkins, test this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 5, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1702. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17950/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 5, 2014

QA results for PR 1702:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17950/consoleFull

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 82624e2 Aug 6, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2014
@avati @pwendell
[SPARK-2806] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10
6da8f41 
Scala 2.11 packages not available for the current version (3.2.6)

Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avatiredhat.com>

Author: Anand Avati <[email protected]>

Closes #1702 from avati/SPARK-1812-json4s-jackson-3.2.10 and squashes the following commits:

7be8324 [Anand Avati] SPARK-1812: core - upgrade to json4s 3.2.10
(cherry picked from commit 82624e2)

Signed-off-by: Patrick Wendell <[email protected]>
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
@avati @conviva-zz
[SPARK-2806] core - upgrade to json4s-jackson 3.2.10
55a9376 
Scala 2.11 packages not available for the current version (3.2.6)

Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avatiredhat.com>

Author: Anand Avati <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1702 from avati/SPARK-1812-json4s-jackson-3.2.10 and squashes the following commits:

7be8324 [Anand Avati] SPARK-1812: core - upgrade to json4s 3.2.10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@avati @AmplabJenkins @ScrapCodes @pwendell @SparkQA