Skip to content

[SPARK-2758] UnionRDD's UnionPartition should not reference parent RDDs #1675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[SPARK-2758] UnionRDD's UnionPartition should not reference parent RDDs #1675

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jul 30, 2014

No description provided.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jul 30, 2014

This blocks #1648.

@tdas please take a look at this to make sure this works well with checkpointing.

@mateiz
Copy link
Contributor

mateiz commented Jul 30, 2014

Jenkins, test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 30, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1675. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17513/consoleFull

@mateiz
Copy link
Contributor

mateiz commented Jul 31, 2014

Looks good to me if it passes tests

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Jul 31, 2014

Same as what Matei said.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2014

QA results for PR 1675:
- This patch FAILED unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17513/consoleFull

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jul 31, 2014

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1675. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17524/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2014

QA results for PR 1675:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17524/consoleFull

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jul 31, 2014

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1675. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17545/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2014

QA results for PR 1675:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17545/consoleFull

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jul 31, 2014

Merging this in master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 894d48f Jul 31, 2014
@JoshRosen JoshRosen mentioned this pull request Aug 4, 2014
Closed
@rxin rxin deleted the unionrdd branch August 13, 2014 08:02
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
@rxin @conviva-zz
[SPARK-2758] UnionRDD's UnionPartition should not reference parent RDDs
f7201bc 
Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1675 from rxin/unionrdd and squashes the following commits:

941d316 [Reynold Xin] Clear RDDs for checkpointing.
c9f05f2 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-2758] UnionRDD's UnionPartition should not reference parent RDDs
sunchao pushed a commit to sunchao/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
@huaxingao @viirya
Disable assertProjectExec for boson exec (apache#1675)
a12ab4a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rxin @mateiz @SparkQA @tdas