[SQL][minor] simplify a test to fix the maven tests #16244
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
| assert(actual(0) == cases) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("SPARK-18091: split large if expressions into blocks due to JVM code size limit") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cloud-fan Just confirming, have you made sure that this test fails without the fix for SPARK-18091?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what do you mean? this test was added by SPARK-18091
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test simulates the scenario where large code for components of If expression causes JVM's method code size limit to be hit. So the point of having this test is if it fails before the fix for SPARK-18091 was committed and it passes afterwards. By failure I mean it gets terminated due to the method code size limit exceeded exception.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yea of course, I reverted SPARK-18091 and ran this test locally, it failed.
Member
|
How do we make sure the fixed test passes Maven-based tests? Manually? |
Contributor
Author
|
Actually I can't reproduce this issue locally, but by looking at the logs, I'm 90% percent sure this is the cause. The only way to verify it may be merging and checking the jenkins maven status again. |
|
Test build #69955 has finished for PR 16244 at commit
|
srowen
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2016
Contributor
|
sgtm |
Member
|
@cloud-fan Ok. I see. LGTM. |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? After #15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in #15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet. Since #15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation. ## How was this patch tested? test only change Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes #16244 from cloud-fan/minor. (cherry picked from commit 9abd05b) Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Member
|
Merged to master, 2.1 and 2.0, in order to see if this resolves the test failures for 2.0 |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? After #15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in #15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet. Since #15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation. ## How was this patch tested? test only change Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes #16244 from cloud-fan/minor. (cherry picked from commit 9abd05b) Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
kapilsingh5050
pushed a commit
to kapilsingh5050/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? After apache#15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in apache#15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet. Since apache#15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation. ## How was this patch tested? test only change Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes apache#16244 from cloud-fan/minor.
robert3005
pushed a commit
to palantir/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? After apache#15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in apache#15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet. Since apache#15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation. ## How was this patch tested? test only change Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes apache#16244 from cloud-fan/minor.
uzadude
pushed a commit
to uzadude/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? After apache#15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in apache#15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet. Since apache#15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation. ## How was this patch tested? test only change Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes apache#16244 from cloud-fan/minor.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After #15620 , all of the Maven-based 2.0 Jenkins jobs time out consistently. As I pointed out in #15620 (comment) , it seems that the regression test is an overkill and may hit constants pool size limitation, which is a known issue and hasn't been fixed yet.
Since #15620 only fix the code size limitation problem, we can simplify the test to avoid hitting constants pool size limitation.
How was this patch tested?
test only change