-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-18261][Structured Streaming] Add statistics to MemorySink for joining #15786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -187,6 +187,22 @@ class MemorySinkSuite extends StreamTest with BeforeAndAfter { | |
| query.stop() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("MemoryPlan statistics") { | ||
| implicit val schema = new StructType().add(new StructField("value", IntegerType)) | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. thanks! This will be much faster than a test where we actually join DataFrames.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. happy to do this |
||
| val sink = new MemorySink(schema, InternalOutputModes.Append) | ||
| val plan = new MemoryPlan(sink) | ||
|
|
||
| // Before adding data, check output | ||
| checkAnswer(sink.allData, Seq.empty) | ||
| assert(plan.statistics.sizeInBytes === 0) | ||
|
|
||
| sink.addBatch(0, 1 to 3) | ||
| assert(plan.statistics.sizeInBytes === 12) | ||
|
|
||
| sink.addBatch(1, 4 to 6) | ||
| assert(plan.statistics.sizeInBytes === 24) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ignore("stress test") { | ||
| // Ignore the stress test as it takes several minutes to run | ||
| (0 until 1000).foreach { _ => | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
everywhere else, this is defined as a lazy val. Can you make it such that:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @brkyvz. I'm afraid it should not be
lazy valas the statistics should vary from batch to batch --sink.allData.sizeshould vary from batch to batch.sizePerRow, however, does not vary from batch to batch, thus it'sprivate valas it is now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh yeah! you're right! good catch!