Skip to content

Conversation

@yucai
Copy link
Contributor

@yucai yucai commented Sep 22, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

"agg_plan" are hardcoded in HashAggregateExec, which have potential issue, so removing them.

How was this patch tested?

existing tests.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Sep 22, 2016

Jenkins, test this please.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Sep 22, 2016

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 22, 2016

Test build #3287 has finished for PR 15199 at commit a0730d8.

  • This patch fails MiMa tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 22, 2016

Test build #65788 has finished for PR 15199 at commit a0730d8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 79159a1 Sep 23, 2016
@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Sep 23, 2016

Does this affect branch-2.0?

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

gatorsmile commented Sep 23, 2016

This was introduced by #14176. It does not affect Branch-2.0

@yucai
Copy link
Contributor Author

yucai commented Sep 23, 2016

Thanks all, it should be fixed in master only, my mistake.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants