Skip to content

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon commented Jun 13, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#13619 was merged into master, branch-2.0 but branch-1.6 as well.

This is currently being failed due to the use of spark instead of sqlContext but it even fails after changing this to sqlContext.

It seems the reason is the behaviour was changed in 101663f.

How was this patch tested?

Jenkins tests.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

cc @jkbradley and @zzcclp

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 13, 2016

Test build #60377 has finished for PR 13630 at commit 5555022.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

HyukjinKwon commented Jun 13, 2016

It seems this should be reverted first. Closing this for now (see #13619).

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon reopened this Jun 14, 2016
@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon changed the title [SPARK-15892][ML] Change spark to sqlContext in the test in AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite for 1.6 Revert "Incorrectly merged AFTAggregator with zero total count" for branch-1.6 Jun 14, 2016
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

@jkbradley I will leave this open just in case. Please feel free to do it yourself or merge this.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 14, 2016

Test build #60463 has finished for PR 13630 at commit 4e344cb.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

HyukjinKwon commented Jun 14, 2016

@mengxr @yanboliang Could you please take a look? The build against branch-1.6 is being failed due to this.

@zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor

zzcclp commented Jun 14, 2016

ping @mengxr @yanboliang @jkbradley

@jkbradley
Copy link
Member

My apologies for the slow response. I just reverted it manually in commit 2f3e327

Thank you for pinging! Could you please close this issue, but send a follow up with the backport for branch-1.6?

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Sure! Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants