Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

This was intended, but never materialized in code...

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 10, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1363. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16521/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 10, 2014

QA results for PR 1363:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16521/consoleFull

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16521/

@andrewor14 andrewor14 closed this Jul 10, 2014
@mridulm
Copy link
Contributor

mridulm commented Jul 11, 2014

On the contrary, we should remove all filesystem.close() in spark : since shutdown hooks commit/flush pending messages to hdfs.
filesystem object's are typically global and shared/cached across all uses.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes this is why I closed this. See #1365

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants