Skip to content

Conversation

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun commented May 27, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR changes function SparkSession.builder.sparkContext(..) from private[sql] into private[spark], and uses it if applicable like the followings.

- val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sc.getConf).getOrCreate()
+ val spark = SparkSession.builder().sparkContext(sc).getOrCreate()

How was this patch tested?

Pass the existing Jenkins tests.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

At this time, Scala 2.10 build is also tested locally.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 27, 2016

Test build #59528 has finished for PR 13365 at commit 1731122.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Hi, @andrewor14 .
Could you review this?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 30, 2016

Test build #59619 has finished for PR 13365 at commit 1731122.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Hi, @andrewor14 .
Could you review this PR?

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM thanks for doing this. Merging into master 2.0

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @andrewor14 .

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2016
…plicable.

This PR changes function `SparkSession.builder.sparkContext(..)` from **private[sql]** into **private[spark]**, and uses it if applicable like the followings.
```
- val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sc.getConf).getOrCreate()
+ val spark = SparkSession.builder().sparkContext(sc).getOrCreate()
```

Pass the existing Jenkins tests.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

Closes #13365 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15618.

(cherry picked from commit 85d6b0d)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Or <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 85d6b0d Jun 1, 2016
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the SPARK-15618 branch July 20, 2016 07:37
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr aims to upgrade netty from 4.1.92 to 4.1.93.

### Why are the changes needed?
1.v4.1.92 VS v4.1.93
netty/netty@netty-4.1.92.Final...netty-4.1.93.Final

2.The new version brings some bug fix, eg:
- Reset byte buffer in loop for AbstractDiskHttpData.setContent ([#13320](netty/netty#13320))
- OpenSSL MAX_CERTIFICATE_LIST_BYTES option supported ([#13365](netty/netty#13365))
- Adapt to DirectByteBuffer constructor in Java 21 ([#13366](netty/netty#13366))
- HTTP/2 encoder: allow HEADER_TABLE_SIZE greater than Integer.MAX_VALUE ([#13368](netty/netty#13368))
- Upgrade to latest netty-tcnative to fix memory leak ([#13375](netty/netty#13375))
- H2/H2C server stream channels deactivated while write still in progress ([#13388](netty/netty#13388))
- Channel#bytesBefore(un)writable off by 1 ([#13389](netty/netty#13389))
- HTTP/2 should forward shutdown user events to active streams ([#13394](netty/netty#13394))
- Respect the number of bytes read per datagram when using recvmmsg ([#13399](netty/netty#13399))

3.The release notes as follows:
- https://netty.io/news/2023/05/25/4-1-93-Final.html

4.Why not upgrade to `4-1-94-Final` version?
Because the return value of the 'threadCache()' (from `PoolThreadCache` to `PoolArenasCache`) method of the netty Inner class used in the 'arrow memory netty' version '12.0.1' has changed and belongs to break change, let's wait for the upgrade of the 'arrow memory netty' before upgrading to the '4-1-94-Final' version.

The reference is as follows:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/6af660f48472b8b45a5e01b7136b9b040b185eb1/java/memory/memory-netty/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/PooledByteBufAllocatorL.java#L164
https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/da1a448d5bc4f36cc1744db93fcaf64e198db2bd/buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/PooledByteBufAllocator.java#L732-L736

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GA.

Closes #41681 from panbingkun/upgrade_netty.

Authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants