Skip to content

Conversation

@bhardwajank
Copy link

Due to the non registration of BoundedPriorityQueue with kryoserializer, operations which are dependend on BoundedPriorityQueue are giving exceptions.One such instance is using top along with kryo serialization.
Fixed the issue by registering BoundedPriorityQueue with kryoserializer.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jul 4, 2014

Jenkins, test this please.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jul 5, 2014

Thanks. I've merged this in master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 42f3abd Jul 5, 2014
berngp pushed a commit to ThalesGroup/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2014
…Kry...

Due to the non registration of BoundedPriorityQueue  with kryoserializer, operations which are dependend on BoundedPriorityQueue are giving exceptions.One such instance is using top along with kryo serialization.
Fixed the issue by registering BoundedPriorityQueue with kryoserializer.

Author: ankit.bhardwaj <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1299 from AnkitBhardwaj12/BoundedPriorityQueueWithKryoIssue and squashes the following commits:

a4ae8ed [ankit.bhardwaj] [SPARK-2306]:BoundedPriorityQueue is private and not registered with Kryo
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…Kry...

Due to the non registration of BoundedPriorityQueue  with kryoserializer, operations which are dependend on BoundedPriorityQueue are giving exceptions.One such instance is using top along with kryo serialization.
Fixed the issue by registering BoundedPriorityQueue with kryoserializer.

Author: ankit.bhardwaj <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1299 from AnkitBhardwaj12/BoundedPriorityQueueWithKryoIssue and squashes the following commits:

a4ae8ed [ankit.bhardwaj] [SPARK-2306]:BoundedPriorityQueue is private and not registered with Kryo
@bhardwajank bhardwajank deleted the BoundedPriorityQueueWithKryoIssue branch January 23, 2017 05:34
wangyum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
* [CARMEL-6741] Tag Queries with Join Expansion in Runtime

* Add conf

* Minor fix

* Minor fix

* Minor fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants