Skip to content

Conversation

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr mengxr commented Jul 4, 2014

It would be easy for users to include the netlib-java jniloader in the spark jar, which is LGPL-licensed. We can follow the same approach as ganglia support in Spark, which could be enabled by turning on "-Pganglia-lgpl" at build time. We can use "-Pnetlib-lgpl" flag for this.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16325/

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Jul 10, 2014

Updated PR to use profile only. User needs to enable -Pnetlib-lgpl at build time to include the jni loaders.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16515/

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Jul 10, 2014

Jenkins, retest this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 10, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1295. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16519/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 10, 2014

QA results for PR 1295:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16519/consoleFull

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16519/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 11, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1295. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16540/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 11, 2014

QA results for PR 1295:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16540/consoleFull

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jul 11, 2014

Merging in master. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 2f59ce7 Jul 11, 2014
gzm55 pushed a commit to MediaV/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2014
…r in the build

It would be easy for users to include the netlib-java jniloader in the spark jar, which is LGPL-licensed. We can follow the same approach as ganglia support in Spark, which could be enabled by turning on "-Pganglia-lgpl" at build time. We can use "-Pnetlib-lgpl" flag for this.

Author: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1295 from mengxr/netlib-lgpl and squashes the following commits:

aebf001 [Xiangrui Meng] add a profile to optionally include native BLAS/LAPACK loader in mllib
@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

It would be great to mention this option in the MLlib documentation.

xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…r in the build

It would be easy for users to include the netlib-java jniloader in the spark jar, which is LGPL-licensed. We can follow the same approach as ganglia support in Spark, which could be enabled by turning on "-Pganglia-lgpl" at build time. We can use "-Pnetlib-lgpl" flag for this.

Author: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1295 from mengxr/netlib-lgpl and squashes the following commits:

aebf001 [Xiangrui Meng] add a profile to optionally include native BLAS/LAPACK loader in mllib
wangyum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
)

* [CARMEL-6633] Reduce Skew Join Split Size Considering Expand Node

* Add UT
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants