Skip to content

Conversation

@yjshen
Copy link
Member

@yjshen yjshen commented Jul 2, 2014

The function cast doesn't conform to the intention of "Those expressions are supposed to be in the same data type, and also the return type." comment

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Jul 3, 2014

test this please

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16308/

@asfgit asfgit closed this in a9b52e5 Jul 3, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2014
… ty...

The function cast doesn't conform to the intention of "Those expressions are supposed to be in the same data type, and also the return type." comment

Author: Yijie Shen <[email protected]>

Closes #1283 from yijieshen/master and squashes the following commits:

c7aaa4b [Yijie Shen] [SPARK-2342] Evaluation helper's output type doesn't conform to input type

(cherry picked from commit a9b52e5)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>
@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Jul 3, 2014

Thanks, I merged this into master and 1.0!

xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
… ty...

The function cast doesn't conform to the intention of "Those expressions are supposed to be in the same data type, and also the return type." comment

Author: Yijie Shen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1283 from yijieshen/master and squashes the following commits:

c7aaa4b [Yijie Shen] [SPARK-2342] Evaluation helper's output type doesn't conform to input type
wangyum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
* [CARMEL-6674]: Project fail to be collapsed

* fix checkstyle

* fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants