Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jun 26, 2014

New UI:

screen shot 2014-06-26 at 1 43 52 pm

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 26, 2014

Note that I hacked the internal to get this UI because speculation doesn't launch tasks on the same host. I removed the constraint during testing -- that's why you see them on the same executor.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hive -> hide?

@kayousterhout
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good except for a few naming nits. Also the Json tests are going to (or should!) fail -- you need to update the Json strings at the bottom to include the speculative thing

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you name "e" isSpeculative?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16169/

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16171/

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16172/

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 27, 2014

Ok merging this in master. Thanks for reviewing!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in d1636dd Jun 27, 2014
@kayousterhout
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @rxin I was wondering -- is the TID useless now that the UI shows the attempt #?

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 27, 2014

It's going to be useless if we stop using them in logs. I think right now they might still be useful since they can be used to correlate with log messages.

@kayousterhout
Copy link
Contributor

Oh good point that makes sense

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Reynold Xin [email protected]
wrote:

It's going to be useless if we stop using them in logs. I think right now
they might still be useful since they can be used to correlate with log
messages.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1236 (comment).

xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
New UI:

![screen shot 2014-06-26 at 1 43 52 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/323388/3404643/82b9ddc6-fd73-11e3-96f9-f7592a7aee79.png)

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1236 from rxin/ui-task-attempt and squashes the following commits:

3b645dd [Reynold Xin] Expose attemptId in Stage.
c0474b1 [Reynold Xin] Beefed up unit test.
c404bdd [Reynold Xin] Fix ReplayListenerSuite.
f56be4b [Reynold Xin] Fixed JsonProtocolSuite.
e29e0f7 [Reynold Xin] Minor update.
5e4354a [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-2297][UI] Make task attempt and speculation more explicit in UI.
wangyum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants