Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jun 21, 2014

This makes it easier to use config options in operators.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@rxin rxin changed the title Pass SQLContext instead of SparkContext into physical operators. [SQL] Pass SQLContext instead of SparkContext into physical operators. Jun 21, 2014
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15973/

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 21, 2014

Ok merging this in master & branch-1.0.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in ca5d8b5 Jun 21, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2014
This makes it easier to use config options in operators.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes #1164 from rxin/sqlcontext and squashes the following commits:

797b2fd [Reynold Xin] Pass SQLContext instead of SparkContext into physical operators.

(cherry picked from commit ca5d8b5)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@rxin rxin deleted the sqlcontext branch June 21, 2014 05:50
pdeyhim pushed a commit to pdeyhim/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
This makes it easier to use config options in operators.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1164 from rxin/sqlcontext and squashes the following commits:

797b2fd [Reynold Xin] Pass SQLContext instead of SparkContext into physical operators.
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
This makes it easier to use config options in operators.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1164 from rxin/sqlcontext and squashes the following commits:

797b2fd [Reynold Xin] Pass SQLContext instead of SparkContext into physical operators.
udaynpusa pushed a commit to mapr/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants