-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-13320] [SQL] Support Star in CreateStruct/CreateArray and Error Handling when DataFrame/DataSet Functions using Star #11208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3b2b448
structStarExpansion
gatorsmile ac71f39
add a new rule for resolving star.
gatorsmile 8d809bc
address comments.
gatorsmile 2c72edf
address comments.
gatorsmile 6b2d609
address comments.
gatorsmile e47f141
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into sumDataSetResolution
gatorsmile 4b65af3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into sumDataSetResolution
gatorsmile e060dea
address comments.
gatorsmile 99f5312
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into sumDataSetResolution
gatorsmile ba3fe7c
added test cases.
gatorsmile 0fce075
address comments.
gatorsmile 50abeec
address comments.
gatorsmile File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can have a method:
then we can simplify this to:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is a great idea! : )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tried it, but
copyis unable to use here. When the type isExpression(abstract type), we are unable to use thecopyfunction to change thechildren. In addition,withNewChildrenrequires the same number of children. Do you have any idea how to fix it? Thanks!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh i see, I don't have a better idea, let's just keep it this way.