Skip to content

Conversation

@wjur
Copy link
Contributor

@wjur wjur commented Jan 18, 2016

Change assertion's message so it's consistent with the code. The old message says that the invoked method was lapack.dports, where in fact it was lapack.dppsv method.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jan 18, 2016

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 18, 2016

Test build #2401 has finished for PR 10818 at commit 60f0d32.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@wjur
Copy link
Contributor Author

wjur commented Jan 18, 2016

The patch could be also applied to 1.6's branch. Should I create another PR?

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jan 19, 2016

@wjur no, we cherry-pick back into other branches as needed

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jan 19, 2016

Merged to master/1.6

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2016
Change assertion's message so it's consistent with the code. The old message says that the invoked method was lapack.dports, where in fact it was lapack.dppsv method.

Author: Wojciech Jurczyk <[email protected]>

Closes #10818 from wjur/wjur/rename_error_message.

(cherry picked from commit ebd9ce0)
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in ebd9ce0 Jan 19, 2016
@wjur
Copy link
Contributor Author

wjur commented Jan 19, 2016

Thank you, @srowen

@wjur wjur deleted the wjur/rename_error_message branch January 19, 2016 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants