Skip to content

Conversation

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

address comments in #10498 , especially #10498 (comment)

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @davies @rxin

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 7, 2016

Test build #48926 has finished for PR 10638 at commit e523245.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we generate a partition key (excluding the sorting key)? we just need to compare the key

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 8, 2016

Test build #49001 has finished for PR 10638 at commit cceb7a8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2016

Test build #49051 has finished for PR 10638 at commit 247ddad.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Jan 11, 2016

LGTM.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jan 11, 2016

I manually resolved the conflict during merging and merged it. Thanks.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in f253fef Jan 11, 2016
@cloud-fan cloud-fan deleted the bucket-write branch January 11, 2016 09:24
@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Jan 13, 2016

@cloud-fan Should we create a patch for 1.6 branch?

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

only backport it without bucket-write?

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Jan 13, 2016

Yes, cc @marmbrus

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jan 13, 2016

We discussed this and decided not to do it, because this is a simple config change users can apply. Changing the behavior automatically for users in a point release is also bad.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants