Skip to content

Conversation

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun commented Aug 14, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to update README.md with build/test/CI status information.

Why are the changes needed?

To help new comers. You can see the result in the PR branch like the following.

Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 09 30 10

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Could you review this PR, @viirya ?

@viirya
Copy link
Member

viirya commented Aug 14, 2024 via email

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @viirya . Merged to main.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the SPARK-49236 branch August 16, 2024 20:51
dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2025
…tead of `ToStringBuilder`

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to improve `SentinelResourceState.toString` by JEP-280 instead of `ToStringBuilder`.

### Why are the changes needed?

This is aligned with Apache Spark main repository improvement.
- apache/spark#51572

Since Java 9, `String Concatenation` has been handled better by default.

| ID | DESCRIPTION |
| - | - |
| JEP-280 | [Indify String Concatenation](https://openjdk.org/jeps/280) |

For example, `SentinelResourceState.toString` is changed like the following by this PR.

**BEFORE**

```
  public java.lang.String toString();
    Code:
         0: new           #43                 // class org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder
         3: dup
         4: aload_0
         5: invokespecial #45                 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder."<init>":(Ljava/lang/Object;)V
         8: ldc           #48                 // String resource
        10: aload_0
        11: getfield      #17                 // Field resource:Lorg/apache/spark/k8s/operator/BaseResource;
        14: invokevirtual #49                 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder;
        17: ldc           #53                 // String previousGeneration
        19: aload_0
        20: getfield      #39                 // Field previousGeneration:J
        23: invokevirtual #54                 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;J)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder;
        26: ldc           #57                 // String isHealthy
        28: aload_0
        29: getfield      #13                 // Field isHealthy:Z
        32: invokevirtual #58                 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;Z)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder;
        35: invokevirtual #61                 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
        38: areturn
```

**AFTER**

```
  public java.lang.String toString();
    Code:
         0: aload_0
         1: getfield      #17                 // Field resource:Lorg/apache/spark/k8s/operator/BaseResource;
         4: invokestatic  #43                 // Method java/lang/String.valueOf:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/String;
         7: aload_0
         8: getfield      #39                 // Field previousGeneration:J
        11: aload_0
        12: getfield      #13                 // Field isHealthy:Z
        15: invokedynamic #49,  0             // InvokeDynamic #0:makeConcatWithConstants:(Ljava/lang/String;JZ)Ljava/lang/String;
        20: areturn
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes #369 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53818.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants