-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
Add PolarisAdminService.loadEntities helper #2261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: We will need a discussion on how persistence layer is going to support it, as it affects all types of persistence. Loading everything in one call can provide a consistent view, which is nice, but there are some caveats that the uber call may be too large, so that it hits the limits(e.g., memory limit). With that, I think it's premature to consider this as a
TODOitem.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
afaict under the hood
listEntitiesis already fetching the fully fledgedPolarisBaseEntityinstances from the database (for the jdbc case):polaris/persistence/relational-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/polaris/persistence/relational/jdbc/JdbcBasePersistenceImpl.java
Lines 507 to 513 in af69d9f
it includes streaming/pagination.
it just happens that the given
transformerturnsPolarisBaseEntityintoEntityNameLookupRecord... and then later the record is used to look up the full entity again.so afaict, the memory footprint would not be very different if we had a
loadEntitiesfunction (or changedlistEntitiesto not only return aEntityNameLookupRecord).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. I also think the overall load is lower.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be clear, I'm not against the idea, but we will need a discussion.