Skip to content

DOCS: Clearly document unsupported Iceberg Features #1109

@sungwy

Description

@sungwy

Feature Request / Improvement

Some features that users expect from an Iceberg Client (like #1084) are not yet implemented in PyIceberg, leading to much wasted time from our users.

It will be helpful to clearly document what features are not yet supported on Iceberg to minimize frustration and wasted effort from our community.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions