HADOOP-19342. SaslRpcServer.AuthMethod print INFO messages in client side

[szetszwo]

Description of PR

HADOOP-19342

After HADOOP-19306, the following INFO messages are printed in client side. Thanks @steveloughran for reporting it in #7140 (comment) .

We also change SaslMechanismFactory in order to lazily loading the conf. Otherwise, the conf path may not be set up correctly.

2024-11-18 18:53:37,645 [setup] INFO  security.SaslRpcServer (SaslRpcServer.java:<init>(239)) - AuthMethod SIMPLE: code=80, mechanism=""
2024-11-18 18:53:37,645 [setup] INFO  security.SaslRpcServer (SaslRpcServer.java:<init>(239)) - AuthMethod KERBEROS: code=81, mechanism="GSSAPI"
2024-11-18 18:53:37,646 [setup] INFO  security.SaslRpcServer (SaslRpcServer.java:<init>(239)) - AuthMethod DIGEST: code=82, mechanism="DIGEST-MD5"
2024-11-18 18:53:37,646 [setup] INFO  security.SaslRpcServer (SaslRpcServer.java:<init>(239)) - AuthMethod TOKEN: code=82, mechanism="DIGEST-MD5"
2024-11-18 18:53:37,646 [setup] INFO  security.SaslRpcServer (SaslRpcServer.java:<init>(239)) - AuthMethod PLAIN: code=83, mechanism="PLAIN"

How was this patch tested?

Manual test.

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• [NA] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• [NA] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• [NA] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 34s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	48m 31s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	19m 13s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	compile	17m 30s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 20s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 52s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 17s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 59s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 45s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	39m 50s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 0s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	16m 49s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javac	16m 49s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	16m 13s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
+1 💚	javac	16m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 16s		hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch generated 0 new + 48 unchanged - 1 fixed = 48 total (was 49)
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 43s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 15s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 55s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 46s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	37m 12s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	20m 44s		hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	1m 5s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		235m 42s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7174/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#7174
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 563006313dfd 5.15.0-124-generic #134-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 27 20:20:17 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / bf515f9
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu220.04-ga
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7174/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	3109 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7174/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[steveloughran]

that test is gone?

[szetszwo]

@steveloughran , yes, removed the test since it affects other tests as you mentioned. Tried multiple things but not working very well. One problem is that Configuration has addDefaultResource but not removeDefaultResource. Let skip the test.

[steveloughran]

Tried multiple things but not working very well. One problem is that Configuration has addDefaultResource but not removeDefaultResource. Let skip the test.

ok. something for the future

I'd thought the trick would be to write an empty config file to the destination, but there's still risk

[steveloughran]

+1

[szetszwo]

@steveloughran , @stoty, thanks a lot for reviewing this!