HADOOP-19305: Fix ProcessEnvironment ClassCastException in Shell.java

[zhangbutao]

Description of PR

See HADOOP-19305 and HIVE-28191

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	17m 47s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ branch-3.4.1 Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	48m 41s		branch-3.4.1 passed
+1 💚	compile	19m 43s		branch-3.4.1 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚	compile	17m 59s		branch-3.4.1 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 20s		branch-3.4.1 passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 47s		branch-3.4.1 passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 14s		branch-3.4.1 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 54s		branch-3.4.1 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 38s		branch-3.4.1 passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	41m 11s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 58s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	18m 56s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚	javac	18m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	17m 55s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚	javac	17m 55s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 42s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 12s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 51s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 41s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	40m 59s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	19m 31s		hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	1m 3s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		261m 13s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7107/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#7107
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 26b5216a69ff 5.15.0-118-generic #128-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 5 09:28:59 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	branch-3.4.1 / 870e940
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7107/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1449 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7107/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[github-actions]

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.