Revert "HADOOP-16822. Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api"

[pan3793]

This reverts commit 2c4ab72.

Description of PR

TL;DR, it generate the wrong source code and messes the code jump in IDEA.

See details in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822

How was this patch tested?

Pass CI.

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[pan3793]

cc @jojochuang @steveloughran

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	60m 0s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 1s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	47m 43s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 21s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	compile	0m 21s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 25s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 25s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 23s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	shadedclient	86m 44s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	7m 21s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 13s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 13s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	javac	0m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 14s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 13s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	shadedclient	38m 7s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	0m 18s		hadoop-client-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 34s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		197m 55s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#6458
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname	Linux 41ba3b906dea 5.15.0-88-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2 15:18:56 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 34a7bca
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	566 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api U: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[pan3793]

Also cc @pjfanning @Hexiaoqiao

[pan3793]

I think we already reached the consensus in the JIRA discussion, could any committer take a look?

cc @slfan1989 @sunchao

[cxzl25]

LGTM

[pan3793]

cc @aajisaka @steveloughran

[steveloughran]

done, though as I pressed sent I realised the title had pulled line #2 up; sorry.

will cherrypick to 3.4

[steveloughran]

merged to 3.4; branch-3.3 had conflicts. @pan3793 if you want it there, create another PR so yetus can validate it. thanks!