Skip to content

Conversation

@vinayakumarb
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vinayakumarb vinayakumarb force-pushed the trunk branch 2 times, most recently from 2c33176 to 88082b7 Compare September 27, 2019 17:13
@vinayakumarb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will update the PR later today

@ayushtkn
Copy link
Member

Thanx @vinayakumarb for the work here, can you give a check to the scripts in dev-support.
I tried create-release and that seems to be failing.

@vinayakumarb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @ayushtkn for reviews.

@Apache9 @jojochuang Please take a look latest change as well. Thanks

Copy link
Member

@ayushtkn ayushtkn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanx @vinayakumarb for the updates.
LGTM

Copy link

@Apache9 Apache9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM. Still feel a bit strange that why we bind to protobuf 3.7 but not a blocker. Can be a follow on.

…shaded protobuf. Addendum fixed message in script
@vinayakumarb vinayakumarb self-assigned this Jan 13, 2020
@vinayakumarb vinayakumarb merged commit fd78dcf into apache:trunk Jan 13, 2020
@vinayakumarb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged.
Thanks @Apache9 @ayushtkn @jojochuang @brahmareddybattula for reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants