-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
JAVA-3057 Allow decoding a UDT that has more fields than expected #1635
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
77 changes: 77 additions & 0 deletions
77
...tion-tests/src/test/java/com/datastax/oss/driver/internal/core/type/codec/UdtCodecIT.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
| * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
| * distributed with this work for additional information | ||
| * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
| * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
| * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
| * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| * limitations under the License. | ||
| */ | ||
| package com.datastax.oss.driver.internal.core.type.codec; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||
| import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy; | ||
|
|
||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.core.CqlSession; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.core.cql.Row; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.core.data.UdtValue; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.core.type.UserDefinedType; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.core.type.codec.TypeCodec; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.testinfra.ccm.CcmRule; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.api.testinfra.session.SessionRule; | ||
| import com.datastax.oss.driver.categories.ParallelizableTests; | ||
| import java.util.Objects; | ||
| import org.junit.Rule; | ||
| import org.junit.Test; | ||
| import org.junit.experimental.categories.Category; | ||
| import org.junit.rules.RuleChain; | ||
| import org.junit.rules.TestRule; | ||
|
|
||
| @Category(ParallelizableTests.class) | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you reformat this with?: |
||
| public class UdtCodecIT { | ||
|
|
||
| private CcmRule ccmRule = CcmRule.getInstance(); | ||
|
|
||
| private SessionRule<CqlSession> sessionRule = SessionRule.builder(ccmRule).build(); | ||
|
|
||
| @Rule public TestRule chain = RuleChain.outerRule(ccmRule).around(sessionRule); | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void should_decoding_udt_be_backward_compatible() { | ||
| CqlSession session = sessionRule.session(); | ||
| session.execute("CREATE TYPE test_type_1 (a text, b int)"); | ||
| session.execute("CREATE TABLE test_table_1 (e int primary key, f frozen<test_type_1>)"); | ||
| // insert a row using version 1 of the UDT schema | ||
| session.execute("INSERT INTO test_table_1(e, f) VALUES(1, {a: 'a', b: 1})"); | ||
| UserDefinedType udt = | ||
| session | ||
| .getMetadata() | ||
| .getKeyspace(sessionRule.keyspace()) | ||
| .flatMap(ks -> ks.getUserDefinedType("test_type_1")) | ||
| .orElseThrow(IllegalStateException::new); | ||
| TypeCodec<?> oldCodec = session.getContext().getCodecRegistry().codecFor(udt); | ||
| // update UDT schema | ||
| session.execute("ALTER TYPE test_type_1 add i text"); | ||
| // insert a row using version 2 of the UDT schema | ||
| session.execute("INSERT INTO test_table_1(e, f) VALUES(2, {a: 'b', b: 2, i: 'b'})"); | ||
| Row row = | ||
| Objects.requireNonNull(session.execute("SELECT f FROM test_table_1 WHERE e = ?", 2).one()); | ||
| // Try to read new row with old codec. Using row.getUdtValue() would not cause any issues, | ||
| // because new codec will be automatically registered (using all 3 attributes). | ||
| // If application leverages generic row.get(String, Codec) method, data reading with old codec | ||
| // should | ||
| // be backward-compatible. | ||
| UdtValue value = Objects.requireNonNull((UdtValue) row.get("f", oldCodec)); | ||
| assertThat(value.getString("a")).isEqualTo("b"); | ||
| assertThat(value.getInt("b")).isEqualTo(2); | ||
| assertThatThrownBy(() -> value.getString("i")).hasMessage("i is not a field in this UDT"); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels ok given that the only operations you can do on
ALTER TYPEareADDandRENAME,Given that:
This means you won't risk reading the wrong field as position-ally everything should be retained after any
ALTER TYPEoperation.Also considering that you can still write a udt value with the old udtCodec when the type is altered, it seems reasonable that you'd be able to read partially from it as well.
I suppose there is some inherent risk of someone creating a
UdtCodecby hand and potentially reading the wrong interpretation of things; but I think that should probably done at your own peril anyways.If you pull a
UdtCodecfrom the registry and the type is later changed, the codec would still be usable after this change, this seems of more value than protecting against the risk I outlined.