build: fix screenshot-tool app deployment #8174
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
googlebot
added
the
cla: yes
jelbourn
added
pr: lgtm
action: merge
devversion
force-pushed
the
build/fix-screenshot-deployment
branch
from
a2568f4 to
1bbfa75
Compare
Contributor
|
Needs rebase |
andrewseguin
added
pr: needs rebase
and removed
action: merge
* Fixes mismatching dependencies that lead to build errors inside of the screenshot-tool app.
devversion
force-pushed
the
build/fix-screenshot-deployment
branch
from
1bbfa75 to
8fdeea5
Compare
devversion
added
action: merge
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: Hopefully the CI won't install any other dependencies once it's merged. Locally it works fine and with a lock-file it may work more safely too. But not sure its worth pushing another lock file.