Skip to content

UTBotCpp-253 Better structure fields initialization in generated tests #253 #263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 6, 2022

Conversation

alexey-utkin
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexey-utkin alexey-utkin commented Jun 6, 2022

UTBotCpp-253 Better structure fields initialization in generated tests#253

  • implemented multiline printer with generation of field prefixes (~ .field=)
  • separated the cases: c++ initializer-list of a member in constructor/c-like init lists
    (labels like .field= are not supported in c++ initializer-list, the comments are used instead)
  • test coverage

…s#253

- implemented multiline printer with generation of field prefixes (~ `.field=`)
- separated the cases: c++ initializer-list of a member in constructor/c-like init lists
  (labels like `.field=` are not supported in c++ initializer-list, the comments are used instead)
- test coverage
@alexey-utkin alexey-utkin requested a review from ladisgin June 6, 2022 13:34
@alexey-utkin alexey-utkin changed the title UTBotCpp-253 Better structure fields initialization in generated tests#253 UTBotCpp-253 Better structure fields initialization in generated tests #253 Jun 6, 2022
@alexey-utkin alexey-utkin self-assigned this Jun 6, 2022
…s#253

- made the tests value-independent.
  Found consts are different on dev and build machines.
Copy link
Member

@ladisgin ladisgin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGFM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants