Improvement to PR #549 - create a separate facet for utilities #550
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ies and generally improve code structure
|
|
|
this is just a merge into another branch. accepting straight away |
Zabuzard
merged commit 17e0c73
into
Together-Java:feature/methods_return_non_null_by_default
Zabuzard
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
…ies and generally improve code structure (#550)
Zabuzard
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
* Added annotation * Removed now obsolete @nonnull * Somehow an unused method slipped in, weird * Moved the annotation to a different facet to avoid circular dependencies and generally improve code structure (#550) * Removed Nonnull from rebased code Co-authored-by: Sergii <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements the change proposed in comments to #549.
The annotation was moved to a new subproject. In future it can potentially house more utulity stuff than just a single annotation.