-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
EntityReflection provider #141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
I like these changes 👍 Allow me to make one request:
Sidenote: Even though I would most probably approach the "EntityReflection issue" differenly, using a factory for the whole // what I would do
static::$reflections[$class][$mapperClass] =
static::getReflectionFactory()->create($class, $mapperClass)
;
All in all, good job! |
If I understand correctly, it isn't needed - just call
Yeah, factory was first idea but it isn't so easy. It requires rewrite architecture of EntityReflection completely. This PR is "compromise solution".
IMHO it's ok, because it provides informations for reflection. Alternative we can rename interface to |
|
But it is not possible to change the The "provider" name is better then. You are right, it provides for something else. |
|
Ok, so you want:
I will think about it. |
496d615 to
f1b6528
Compare
No description provided.