Use standard ex naming for exceptions

[tudddorrr]

No description provided.

[claude]

🔍 Code Review Feedback

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

Critical Issue in ContinuityManager.cs:110:

• Line still references the old variable name e instead of the renamed ex
• Code: exceptions.Add(e); should be exceptions.Add(ex);
• This will cause a compilation error

---

📏 Code Quality and Best Practices

Inconsistent exception handling in sample files:

• Several catch blocks in the Playground samples still use throw err; after renaming to ex
• Consider updating to throw ex; or better yet, just throw; to preserve the original stack trace
• Files affected: FlushEvents.cs, TrackEvent.cs, SendFeedback.cs, GetLeaderboardEntries.cs, etc.

Exception rethrowing best practice:

• Using throw; instead of throw ex; preserves the original stack trace
• Current approach with throw err; → throw ex; loses stack trace information

---

✅ Overall Assessment

The standardization to ex as the exception variable name is good for consistency. However, there's a compilation error that needs to be fixed, and consider improving the exception rethrowing pattern for better debugging experience.

[claude]

🔍 Code Review

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

The changes consistently standardize exception variable naming from various forms (err, e) to ex, which improves code consistency. However, there are a few areas for improvement:

• LeaderboardUIController.cs:94 - There's an inconsistency where the variable is renamed to ex but line 95 still references e instead of ex, which will cause a compilation error
• FlushEvents.cs & TrackEvent.cs - Consider replacing throw err; with just throw; to preserve the original stack trace (which you've correctly done in the FlushEvents.cs change)

---

🐛 Potential Bugs

• Critical: LeaderboardUIController.cs:94-95 will fail to compile due to the variable name mismatch (ex vs e)

---

🚀 Performance Considerations

No performance impact from these changes.

---

🔒 Security Concerns

No security concerns identified.

---

⏮️ Backwards Compatibility

These changes maintain full backwards compatibility as they only affect internal variable naming within exception handlers.

[claude]

🔍 PR Review: Use standard ex naming for exceptions

📝 Code Quality and Best Practices

Improved Exception Naming Consistency ✓
This PR successfully standardizes exception variable naming from various inconsistent names (e, err, error) to the conventional ex across the codebase. This improves consistency and follows C# naming conventions.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

Minor Exception Re-throwing Issue
In several Playground scripts (FlushEvents.cs:27, TrackEvent.cs:44, SendFeedback.cs:27, etc.), the code changes from throw err; to throw;. While throw; is generally preferred as it preserves the stack trace, verify this change was intentional and aligns with the error handling strategy.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

No performance impact from this refactoring.

---

🔒 Security Concerns

No security implications from variable name changes.

---

🔄 Backwards Compatibility

Full Backwards Compatibility ✓
This is purely an internal variable naming change with no impact on public APIs or external interfaces.

---

✨ Overall Assessment

This is a clean, focused refactoring that improves code consistency. The changes are minimal, safe, and follow C# conventions. Good work on maintaining uniform exception variable naming across the codebase!