-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Clone object proxies in mapper/resource params #519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why call
clonehere instead of indeepFreeze? Do we need a distinct clone for each time it getschecked? If it needs to be here, thencheckis confusingly misnamed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding (@skiplabsdaniel is the authority) is that this is a distinct issue from deep-freezing: these proxy objects are frozen, but when they're used as parameters to mappers and resources, their skip-heap pointers can outlive the lifetime of the objects they point to. So it's not always necessary to clone when freezing: only at this point when the proxy is used as a parameter.
Agreed on the naming point, will change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, but I don't understand. :-) Is it a pointer stored in the skip heap to a proxy object in the js heap that is the problem? Is the proxy in the js heap really just supposed to be a wrapper for a skip object? So would it make sense to have the skip heap hold a pointer the the proxied skip object instead?
It isn't clear how calling
clonehere will make a difference to the relative lifetimes. I worry that this is a bug waiting to happen since theclonecall looks like a nop and someone could easily remove it later.