Skip to content

Conversation

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member

@pp-mo pp-mo commented Oct 1, 2019

WIP do not merge

@lbdreyer
Copy link
Member

lbdreyer commented Oct 1, 2019

It works ... So I wonder why #3431 doesn't pick up dask 1.2 ? 😕

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member Author

pp-mo commented Oct 1, 2019

I wonder why #3431 doesn't pick up dask 1.2 ?

😕 indeed.
N.B. the commit is exactly the same as the first one here.

However, it does seem to be an adequate fix ...

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member Author

pp-mo commented Oct 1, 2019

why #3431 doesn't pick up dask 1.2 ?

Comparing the conda list output, the only differences are ...

package "OLD" pin dask>=1.1 // "NEW" pin dask>=1.2
dask (AND dask-core) 1.1.4 py27_1 defaults // 1.2.2 py_3 conda-forge
pyproj 1.9.6 py27h14380d9_0 defaults // 1.9.6 py27h516909a_1002 conda-forge

In fact that's so odd I don't believe it.
Maybe the underlying channels have just shifted ??
I will re-spin the original checks ...

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member Author

pp-mo commented Oct 1, 2019

I will re-spin the original checks ...

Nope, still does the same.
:sigh:

@pp-mo pp-mo closed this Oct 2, 2019
@pp-mo pp-mo deleted the daskversionfix_1v2 branch October 17, 2019 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants