Skip to content

Conversation

avik-pal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

dual_soln = __nlsolve_dual_soln(sol.u, partials, prob.p)
return SciMLBase.build_solution(
prob, alg, dual_soln, sol.resid; sol.retcode, sol.stats, sol.original)
for (uType, pType) in [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this necessary? This seems pretty ugly

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ambiguity prevention

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a reason this doesn't overload __init and __solve like `OrdinaryDiffEq does?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was asking myself the same question today morning

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think you need to so that you promote first.

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

This is now handled in #458 (via dispatches on __init & __solve)

@avik-pal avik-pal closed this Oct 22, 2024
@avik-pal avik-pal deleted the ap/other_inputs branch October 22, 2024 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants