Skip to content

Conversation

zqy1151215064
Copy link

Added a new test suite for diffArrayCompareKey covering various scenarios, including nested structures, edge cases, and option handling. Refactored diffArrayCompareKey for better performance and maintainability by introducing helper functions, optimizing object matching with compareKey, and improving validation logic. The changes enhance correctness, efficiency, and test coverage.

Added a new test suite for diffArrayCompareKey covering various scenarios, including nested structures, edge cases, and option handling. Refactored diffArrayCompareKey for better performance and maintainability by introducing helper functions, optimizing object matching with compareKey, and improving validation logic. The changes enhance correctness, efficiency, and test coverage.
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zqy1151215064, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new test suite and refactors the diffArrayCompareKey function to improve its performance, maintainability, and test coverage. The changes include the addition of helper functions, optimized object matching, and enhanced validation logic, resulting in a more robust and efficient diffing algorithm.

Highlights

  • Test Suite: Added a comprehensive test suite for diffArrayCompareKey, covering various scenarios including nested structures, edge cases, and option handling. This significantly improves the test coverage and reliability of the function.
  • Refactoring: Refactored diffArrayCompareKey for better performance and maintainability. This includes introducing helper functions (isObjectWithCompareKey, createFormattedLine, processMatchedObjects, validateArrayForCompareKey, processRemovedItems, processAddedItems), optimizing object matching with compareKey, and improving validation logic.
  • Performance Optimization: Improved the performance of diffArrayCompareKey by using a map-based lookup for larger arrays and optimizing the validation process. This reduces the time complexity for matching objects by compareKey.
  • Validation: Enhanced validation logic to handle various edge cases, such as arrays with mixed object and non-object items, objects without compareKey, and duplicate compareKey values. This ensures that the function gracefully falls back to diffArrayNormal when appropriate.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite and significantly refactors diffArrayCompareKey for better performance and maintainability. The use of helper functions and the map-based optimization for object matching are great improvements. My feedback focuses on further enhancing the code by removing some dead code, simplifying a function signature for clarity, ensuring all comments are in English for broader accessibility, and pointing out a potential performance improvement related to array concatenation inside a loop.

Improved performance in diffing arrays of objects by batching concatenations and simplifying the validation function for compareKey. Updated comments in tests for clarity and replaced Chinese with English. The validation function now returns a boolean, streamlining the recursive diff logic.
@utkuakyuz
Copy link
Contributor

I just suspect handling this much edge case causes some issue about original compare by key method. I mean in my case I had to went through dozens of JSON objects to validate the compare by key logic works properly.

Please consider using several different JSON objects to compare and be sure the output is not corrupted.

Introduces comprehensive tests to validate diffArrayCompareKey with large arrays, mixed operations, and diverse JSON object structures. These tests ensure correct handling, performance, and structural integrity under various scenarios.
@zqy1151215064
Copy link
Author

I just suspect handling this much edge case causes some issue about original compare by key method. I mean in my case I had to went through dozens of JSON objects to validate the compare by key logic works properly.

Please consider using several different JSON objects to compare and be sure the output is not corrupted.

@utkuakyuz Oh totally! Yeah I was paranoid about breaking the main logic too while adding all these optimizations 😅

Threw in some stress tests with 1k objects and different JSON shapes - seems to hold up fine (~240ms, proper diffs). Your point about testing diverse objects was smart, that's exactly what I needed to verify.

Appreciate you keeping an eye on this!

Increased the size and complexity of arrays in the performance test to better simulate real-world scenarios. Refactored the JSON structure test to use a single complex object type, updated modification/addition/removal checks, and improved clarity of test assertions.
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants