Skip to content

Conversation

daxian-dbw
Copy link
Member

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw commented Oct 27, 2021

PR Summary

Fix #16293
Before #16165, we were using InternalSymbolicLinkLinkCodeMethods.WinInternalGetTarget to try resolving a possible link path, and that API never throws -- catch exception and returns null. However, File.ResolveLinkTarget throws when there is any error while resolving the link path, e.g. the file system doesn't support reparse point. This caused a regression in 7.2.0-rc1.

The fix is to wrap File.ResolveLinkTarget in a try/catch block, and use the original fileName when ResolveLinkTarget fails.

@iSazonov and @jborean93, thank you both for bring the regression to our attention, and also worked out the test.

PR Checklist

@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log label Oct 27, 2021
…ndProcessor.Tests.ps1

Co-authored-by: Aditya Patwardhan <[email protected]>
…ndProcessor.Tests.ps1

Co-authored-by: Aditya Patwardhan <[email protected]>
@adityapatwardhan
Copy link
Member

@daxian-dbw New test is failing.. please have a look

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 37 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +34 -3
Percentile : 14.8%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +5 -3
.ps1 : +29 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 8, 2021

🎉v7.2.0 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Copy link

@t10-13rocket t10-13rocket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 16, 2021

🎉v7.3.0-preview.1 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport-7.2.x-Done CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log Extra Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OperationStopped: Incorrect function when running an exe from a mounted ISO
5 participants