Skip to content

Conversation

@maxsam4
Copy link
Contributor

@maxsam4 maxsam4 commented Mar 18, 2019

Ported changes from #601

uint256[] memory _fromTime,
uint256[] memory _toTime,
uint256[] memory _expiryTime
uint64[] memory _canSendAfter,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in 2.1.0 you used uint256 in function arguments and then typecast those into uint64 in the function body. Shouldn't we make consistency in both branches

Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxsam4 maxsam4 Mar 18, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We used uint256 in 2.1 to make the interface compatible with 2.0. (We want to use the same dApp on 2.0 and 2.1 version of security token/modules)

There is no need to keep 3.0 and 2.1 compatible as they will require different dApps anyway.

@satyamakgec satyamakgec merged commit 22aab9f into dev-3.0.0 Mar 19, 2019
@maxsam4 maxsam4 deleted the gtm-matm-optimizations branch April 9, 2019 07:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants