Add HR Cloud components #15815
Add HR Cloud components #15815
Conversation
Added new webhook triggers: - new-employee-instant: Emits event when new employee is added - new-leave-request-instant: Emits event when leave request is submitted - new-timesheet-entry-instant: Emits event when timesheet entry is logged Added new actions: - create-employee: Creates a new employee record - approve-leave-request: Approves a pending leave request - log-timesheet-entry: Logs a new timesheet entry Includes filtering options for triggers and required/optional fields for actions. Resolves #15812 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and updates to the HR Cloud integration. A README now explains the HR Cloud system and its API usage. Multiple new actions have been added for creating and updating employees and tasks. The HR Cloud app file has been expanded with detailed property definitions and new API methods. Additionally, new source modules for webhook event management have been implemented. Minor newline changes were also applied to several other component files. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Client
participant Action as CreateEmployeeAction
participant App as hr_cloud.app
participant API as HR Cloud API
Client->>Action: Initiate createEmployee action
Action->>App: Call createEmployee() method
App->>API: _makeRequest with employee data
API-->>App: Return response
App-->>Action: Pass response data
Action-->>Client: Return summary and response
sequenceDiagram
participant Source as NewEmployeeSource
participant App as hr_cloud.app
participant API as HR Cloud API
participant DB as Database
Source->>App: Request getEmployees/getResults
App->>API: _makeRequest to fetch events
API-->>App: Return event data
App->>DB: Update/retrieve timestamp (_getLastTs/_setLastTs)
App-->>Source: Return new event data
Source->>Source: Emit event with metadata
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
components/hr_cloud/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs (2)
24-34: Add error handling to improve robustness.The action doesn't include any error handling, which could lead to uncaught exceptions if the API call fails.
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.hrCloud.approveLeaveRequest(this.leaveRequestId, { - $, - data: { - note: this.approvalNote, - }, - }); - - $.export("$summary", `Successfully approved leave request (ID: ${this.leaveRequestId})`); - return response; + try { + const response = await this.hrCloud.approveLeaveRequest(this.leaveRequestId, { + $, + data: { + note: this.approvalNote, + }, + }); + + $.export("$summary", `Successfully approved leave request (ID: ${this.leaveRequestId})`); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to approve leave request (ID: ${this.leaveRequestId}): ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },
35-36: Add a newline at the end of file.There's no newline at the end of the file, which may cause linting errors. It's a best practice to have a newline at the end of files.
}; - +components/hr_cloud/sources/new-timesheet-entry-instant/new-timesheet-entry-instant.mjs (1)
49-50: Add a newline at the end of file.There's no newline at the end of the file, which may cause linting errors. It's a best practice to have a newline at the end of files.
}; - +components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
58-59: Add a newline at the end of file.There's no newline at the end of the file, which may cause linting errors. It's a best practice to have a newline at the end of files.
}; - +components/hr_cloud/sources/new-leave-request-instant/new-leave-request-instant.mjs (2)
6-8: Consider adding a category tag to the component nameThe component name "New Leave Request (Instant)" is clear, but adding a category tag like "[HR Cloud]" at the beginning would make it more identifiable in the component list when users have multiple integrations.
- name: "New Leave Request (Instant)", + name: "[HR Cloud] New Leave Request (Instant)",
31-37: Add error handling for missing data fieldsThe
generateMetamethod assumes thatdata.id,data.employee_name,data.leave_type, anddata.created_atwill always be present. Consider adding validation to handle cases where these fields might be missing.generateMeta(data) { + if (!data.id || !data.employee_name || !data.leave_type || !data.created_at) { + console.log("Warning: Received incomplete leave request data", data); + } return { - id: data.id, - summary: `New Leave Request: ${data.employee_name} - ${data.leave_type}`, - ts: Date.parse(data.created_at), + id: data.id || `leave_request_${Date.now()}`, + summary: `New Leave Request: ${data.employee_name || "Unknown"} - ${data.leave_type || "Unspecified"}`, + ts: data.created_at ? Date.parse(data.created_at) : Date.now(), }; },components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-instant/new-employee-instant.mjs (2)
6-8: Consider adding a category tag to the component nameSimilar to the previous component, adding a category tag would improve component identification in the list.
- name: "New Employee (Instant)", + name: "[HR Cloud] New Employee (Instant)",
40-46: Add error handling for missing data fieldsThe
generateMetamethod should handle cases where expected fields might be missing in the webhook payload.generateMeta(data) { + if (!data.id || !data.first_name || !data.last_name || !data.created_at) { + console.log("Warning: Received incomplete employee data", data); + } return { - id: data.id, - summary: `New Employee: ${data.first_name} ${data.last_name}`, - ts: Date.parse(data.created_at), + id: data.id || `employee_${Date.now()}`, + summary: `New Employee: ${data.first_name || ""} ${data.last_name || ""}`.trim() || "Unknown Employee", + ts: data.created_at ? Date.parse(data.created_at) : Date.now(), }; },components/hr_cloud/actions/log-timesheet-entry/log-timesheet-entry.mjs (1)
5-7: Consider adding a category tag to the component nameAdding a category tag would improve component identification in the UI.
- name: "Log Timesheet Entry", + name: "[HR Cloud] Log Timesheet Entry",components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (3)
6-153: Consider adding robust pagination handling for property definitions.
All theasync options({ page })methods increment the page number by 1 to fetch new results, but it’s unclear how you’ll handle cases where the total available pages exceed this single step. In scenarios where large datasets exist (e.g., thousands of employees or projects), consider adding logic to detect when to stop fetching or to merge additional results, ensuring the user sees complete lists.
165-180: Ensure consistent error handling in_makeRequestmethod.
The_makeRequestmethod delegates error handling to Pipedream’s built-in axios wrapper, but any custom error logic (e.g., logging, user-friendly error messages, or retries) is not handled. Adding a try-catch block, or implementing a standardized error-handling strategy, can improve resilience and help with debugging.
249-255: Handle partial approvals or conflicts for leave requests.
While theapproveLeaveRequestmethod sends a PUT request to approve a leave, there might be scenarios where the request is no longer valid (e.g., overlapping leaves or conflicting approvals). Consider adding logic to manage or detect these conflicts and provide better feedback to end users.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/hr_cloud/README.md(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/log-timesheet-entry/log-timesheet-entry.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/package.json(2 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-instant/new-employee-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-leave-request-instant/new-leave-request-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-timesheet-entry-instant/new-timesheet-entry-instant.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/hr_cloud/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/hr_cloud/package.json
[error] 18-18: Newline required at end of file but not found (eol-last)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/hr_cloud/package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump is appropriate for the added features.The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2 is appropriate for the new HR Cloud components being added in this PR.
14-16: Dependencies added appropriately.The addition of
@pipedream/platformdependency is appropriate for accessing Pipedream platform features.components/hr_cloud/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs (2)
3-8: Component metadata looks good.The component key, name, description, version, and type are well-defined. Including a documentation link in the description is a good practice.
9-23: Props are properly defined.The props are correctly structured, using propDefinitions from the HR Cloud app. This promotes consistency and reusability across components.
components/hr_cloud/sources/new-timesheet-entry-instant/new-timesheet-entry-instant.mjs (4)
3-9: Source component metadata looks good.The key, name, description, version, and type are well-defined. Including a documentation link in the description is a good practice.
10-25: Props are properly extended from common module.The component correctly extends the common props and adds additional props specific to this source (projectId and employeeId). Making employeeId optional allows for more flexible filtering.
27-40: Metadata filtering implementation is robust.The
getMetadatamethod properly handles the optional nature of projectId and employeeId by only adding them to the metadata object when they exist. This prevents sending undefined values to the API.
41-47: Event metadata construction is well-formatted.The
generateMetamethod creates a well-structured summary that includes employee name and hours, making it easy for users to identify the event at a glance.components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (3)
3-8: Component metadata looks good.The component key, name, description, version, and type are well-defined. Including a documentation link in the description is a good practice.
9-41: Props are properly defined.All necessary employee properties are defined using propDefinitions from the HR Cloud app, promoting consistency and reusability.
45-53:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify API field mapping is correct.
The code maps component props to API fields using snake_case (e.g., first_name, last_name). Ensure that these field names match what the HR Cloud API expects.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's any documentation about the HR Cloud API field format grep -r "first_name\|last_name\|job_title_id\|department_id\|start_date" --include="*.md" --include="*.mjs" .Length of output: 69740
Action: Confirm HR Cloud API field names
The mapping in this file uses snake_case keys—
first_name,last_name,job_title_id,department_id, andstart_date—which is consistent with similar integrations throughout the codebase. However, there isn’t internal documentation that explicitly confirms these exact field names for the HR Cloud API. Please verify against the external HR Cloud API documentation that these are the expected field names. If they are correct, consider adding a comment or reference link to the API docs in the code for future clarity.
- Location:
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(lines 45–53)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
181-193: Validate webhook creation and response data.
When creating webhooks, it’s best practice to confirm the API’s response to ensure the webhook was registered successfully. You could, for instance, verify that the returned webhook object includes the ID or endpoint that was requested. This provides stronger guarantees that the registration succeeded.
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/hr_cloud/actions/log-timesheet-entry/log-timesheet-entry.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
263-269: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation when creating timesheet entries.
Validating properties like date formats, integer ranges for hours, and project existence can prevent erroneous data from being sent to the HR Cloud API. Consider checking these fields before calling
_makeRequestto reduce API failures and improve maintainability.async createTimesheetEntry(args = {}) { + // Validate that required fields exist and are in the correct format + if (args.data) { + const { employee_id, project_id, date, hours } = args.data; + + if (!employee_id) { + throw new Error("Employee ID is required"); + } + + if (!project_id) { + throw new Error("Project ID is required"); + } + + // Validate date format (YYYY-MM-DD) + if (!date || !/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/.test(date)) { + throw new Error("Date must be in YYYY-MM-DD format"); + } + + // Validate hours + if (hours === undefined || hours < 0 || hours > 24) { + throw new Error("Hours must be between 0 and 24"); + } + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/timesheet-entries", ...args, }); },
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (9)
109-113: Consider adding date format validation.The date property specifies a YYYY-MM-DD format, but there's no validation to ensure users input the correct format. This could lead to API errors if malformed dates are submitted.
date: { type: "string", label: "Date", description: "The date of the timesheet entry (YYYY-MM-DD)", + pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$", + errorMessage: { + pattern: "Please enter a valid date in YYYY-MM-DD format", + }, },
135-140: Apply consistent date validation across date fields.The startDate property should also have format validation, similar to the date field.
startDate: { type: "string", label: "Start Date", description: "The employee's start date (YYYY-MM-DD)", + pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$", + errorMessage: { + pattern: "Please enter a valid date in YYYY-MM-DD format", + }, optional: true, },
104-108: Add bounds validation for hours worked.The hours field should have minimum and maximum values to prevent unreasonable entries.
hours: { type: "integer", label: "Hours Worked", description: "The number of hours worked", + minimum: 0, + maximum: 24, },
193-199: Add pagination handling for getEmployees method.The current implementation doesn't handle pagination limits or total record counts, which may be important for users working with large datasets.
async getEmployees(args = {}) { const response = await this._makeRequest({ path: "/employees", ...args, }); - return response.employees || []; + const employees = response.employees || []; + // Include pagination metadata if available in the response + if (response.pagination) { + return { + employees, + pagination: response.pagination, + }; + } + return employees; },
130-134: Add email format validation for the email field.The email property should include a pattern for validation to ensure valid email addresses are provided.
email: { type: "string", label: "Email", description: "The employee's email address", + pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$", + errorMessage: { + pattern: "Please enter a valid email address", + }, },
174-186: Document webhook expected payload formats.Adding documentation on the expected payload formats for different event types would help users implement webhooks correctly.
async createWebhook({ eventType, endpoint, metadata, }) { + // Supported event types: + // - new_employee: Triggered when a new employee is created + // - new_leave_request: Triggered when a new leave request is submitted + // - new_timesheet_entry: Triggered when a new timesheet entry is created + // + // Endpoint should be a valid URL that can receive POST requests + // Metadata is an optional object with additional information to include with the webhook return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/webhooks", data: { event_type: eventType, endpoint, metadata, }, }); },
79-80: Update pagination to support custom page sizes.The current implementation only increments the page number but doesn't allow for customizing the page size.
params: { page: page + 1, + per_page: 100, // Or make this configurable },
148-157: Consider adding API version as a configurable parameter.The base URL is hardcoded to "https://api.hrcloud.com/v1". Making the API version configurable would allow for easier updates if the API version changes.
methods: { + _apiVersion() { + return "v1"; // Make this configurable if needed + }, _baseUrl() { - return "https://api.hrcloud.com/v1"; + return `https://api.hrcloud.com/${this._apiVersion()}`; }, _authHeaders() { return { "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, "Content-Type": "application/json", }; },
242-248: Add logging for leave request approvals.Adding logging for leave request approvals would help with audit trails and debugging.
async approveLeaveRequest(requestId, args = {}) { + console.log(`Approving leave request ${requestId}`); return this._makeRequest({ method: "PUT", path: `/leave-requests/${requestId}/approve`, ...args, + }).then(response => { + console.log(`Successfully approved leave request ${requestId}`); + return response; + }).catch(error => { + console.error(`Failed to approve leave request ${requestId}: ${error.message}`); + throw error; }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/hr_cloud/README.md(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/hr_cloud/README.md
- components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
1-2: LGTM: Clean import from platform package.The import is properly using the platform package which provides standard utilities for Pipedream components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (3)
173-199: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling in _makeRequest method.
The current implementation includes basic error handling for 404 errors, but it could be improved to handle other common HTTP status codes. This would provide more informative feedback to users.
try { console.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); const response = await axios($, config); return response; } catch (error) { console.error(`Error with request to ${path}: ${error.message}`); if (error.response?.status === 404) { throw new Error(`API endpoint not found (404): ${path}. Please verify the API URL structure in the HR Cloud documentation.`); } + if (error.response?.status === 401) { + throw new Error(`Authentication failed (401): Please check your API key.`); + } + if (error.response?.status === 400) { + const errorDetails = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; + throw new Error(`Bad request (400): ${errorDetails}`); + } + if (error.response?.status === 429) { + throw new Error(`Rate limit exceeded (429): Please try again later.`); + } + if (error.response?.status >= 500) { + throw new Error(`HR Cloud server error (${error.response?.status}): Please try again later or contact HR Cloud support.`); + } throw error; }
233-239: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation for createEmployee method.
The createEmployee method should validate that required fields are present before making the API request.
async createEmployee(args = {}) { + // Validate required employee fields + const requiredFields = ["first_name", "last_name", "email"]; + const data = args.data || {}; + + for (const field of requiredFields) { + if (!data[field]) { + throw new Error(`${field.replace('_', ' ')} is required`); + } + } + + // Validate email format + if (data.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(data.email)) { + throw new Error("Invalid email format"); + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/api/employees", ...args, }); },
289-295: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation for createTimesheetEntry method.
Similar to createEmployee, the createTimesheetEntry method should validate required fields and formats.
async createTimesheetEntry(args = {}) { + // Validate required timesheet fields + const data = args.data || {}; + + if (!data.employee_id) { + throw new Error("Employee ID is required"); + } + + if (!data.date) { + throw new Error("Date is required"); + } + + // Validate date format + if (!/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/.test(data.date)) { + throw new Error("Date must be in YYYY-MM-DD format"); + } + + if (!data.hours || data.hours <= 0) { + throw new Error("Hours must be a positive number"); + } + + if (!data.project_id) { + throw new Error("Project ID is required"); + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/api/timesheet-entries", ...args, }); },
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
components/hr_cloud/README.md (3)
15-21: Address bare URL formatting issue in API URL section.The markdown linter has flagged bare URLs in lines 17-19. According to the Markdown best practices, URLs should be properly formatted as links.
-- https://api.hrcloud.com/api/... (default) +- [https://api.hrcloud.com/api/...](https://api.hrcloud.com/api/...) (default) -- https://api.hrcloud.com/v1/api/... (older accounts) +- [https://api.hrcloud.com/v1/api/...](https://api.hrcloud.com/v1/api/...) (older accounts) -- https://api.hrcloud.com/v2/api/... (newer accounts) +- [https://api.hrcloud.com/v2/api/...](https://api.hrcloud.com/v2/api/...) (newer accounts)🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
17-17: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
18-18: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
19-19: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
1-22: Consider adding sections on available components and usage examples.The README provides a good introduction but could be enhanced with additional sections that describe the available triggers (new employee onboarding, new leave requests, new timesheet entries) and actions (creating an employee, approving leave requests, logging timesheet entries) that were added in this PR.
Consider adding:
- A "Components" section listing available triggers and actions
- A "Usage Examples" section with common workflow examples
- A "Troubleshooting" section expanding on common issues beyond 404 errors
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
17-17: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
18-18: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
19-19: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
22-22: Add newline at the end of the file.According to common coding standards, the file should end with a newline character.
If you continue to encounter 404 errors, please contact HR Cloud support to confirm your API URL structure. -22 +components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (6)
116-120: Add date format validation for the date property.The date field requires a specific format (YYYY-MM-DD) but doesn't include validation to ensure users enter dates in this format.
date: { type: "string", label: "Date", description: "The date of the timesheet entry (YYYY-MM-DD)", + validate: (value) => { + const dateRegex = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/; + if (!dateRegex.test(value)) { + return "Please enter a valid date in YYYY-MM-DD format"; + } + return true; + }, },
142-147: Add date format validation for the startDate property.Similar to the date property, startDate requires the YYYY-MM-DD format but doesn't include validation.
startDate: { type: "string", label: "Start Date", description: "The employee's start date (YYYY-MM-DD)", optional: true, + validate: (value) => { + if (!value) return true; // Optional field + const dateRegex = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/; + if (!dateRegex.test(value)) { + return "Please enter a valid date in YYYY-MM-DD format"; + } + return true; + }, },
188-190: Remove or refine console.log statements for production use.Console log statements are useful during development but should be removed or refined for production use to avoid cluttering logs with unnecessary information.
try { - console.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); + // Only log in debug mode or remove completely + if ($.debug) { + console.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); + } const response = await axios($, config); return response;
193-194: Refine error logging for better diagnostics.Similarly, error logging should be refined to provide more useful diagnostic information when needed while avoiding excessive logging in normal operation.
- console.error(`Error with request to ${path}: ${error.message}`); + // Include more detailed error information when available + if ($.debug) { + console.error(`Error with request to ${path}: ${error.message}`); + if (error.response?.data) { + console.error(`Response data:`, JSON.stringify(error.response.data, null, 2)); + } + }
268-274: Add input validation for approveLeaveRequest method.The approveLeaveRequest method should validate that the requestId parameter is provided.
async approveLeaveRequest(requestId, args = {}) { + if (!requestId) { + throw new Error("Leave request ID is required"); + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "PUT", path: `/api/leave-requests/${requestId}/approve`, ...args, }); },
6-295: Consider implementing a more consistent approach to API methods.The API methods currently use different parameter patterns - some take specific parameters plus an args object, while others just take an args object. Consider standardizing the approach for better consistency and maintainability.
For instance, compare:
approveLeaveRequest(requestId, args = {})createEmployee(args = {})A more consistent approach could be either:
- All methods take specific required parameters plus an optional args object
- All methods take a single args object that contains all parameters
This would make the codebase more maintainable and easier to understand for future developers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/hr_cloud/README.md(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
components/hr_cloud/README.md
17-17: Bare URL used
null
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
18-18: Bare URL used
null
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
19-19: Bare URL used
null
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/hr_cloud/README.md (2)
1-4: Great overview of HR Cloud and integration with Pipedream!The introduction provides a clear description of HR Cloud's purpose and its integration with Pipedream for automation.
7-12: Instructions for obtaining API key are clearly outlined.The getting started section effectively guides users through the process of obtaining an API key from HR Cloud.
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (3)
7-153: Well-organized property definitions with clear descriptions.The property definitions are comprehensive and well-structured with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and async options methods where applicable. This will provide users with a good experience when configuring the HR Cloud components.
156-166: Well-implemented base URL method with version support.The _baseUrl method is well-designed to handle different API versions as specified in the README. It defaults to the base URL if no version is specified and correctly uses the version from auth if provided.
200-218: Good webhook implementation for HR Cloud events.The webhook implementation for creating and deleting webhooks is well-designed and aligns with the PR objectives of adding webhook triggers for HR Cloud events.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (2)
6-147: Consider implementing multi-page retrieval
When fetching lists (e.g., departments, projects, employees), you currently retrieve only a single page of results. If there are more items than fit on a single page, some data may be omitted. Implementing pagination (e.g., looping while the API returns additional pages) can ensure complete data retrieval for robust user experiences.
173-173: Avoid logging sensitive information
Logging the full request URL and parameters to the console can inadvertently capture sensitive data or user details. Consider removing or limiting console logs to prevent potential PII leaks in logs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/hr_cloud/README.md(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/hr_cloud/README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (6)
1-2: Import statement is correct
No issues identified with this import.
149-183: Ensure comprehensive error handling
This method’s error handling is incomplete—only 404 is treated specially. A past review comment already suggested a more robust approach (handling different client and server error codes separately). Consider applying that previous guidance.
185-281: All new methods look good
The newly introduced methods (e.g.,createWebhook,deleteWebhook,getEmployees) provide clear, focused API interactions. No major issues spotted.
218-224: Add validation for required employee fields
ThecreateEmployeemethod sends data to the HR Cloud API without checking if required fields (e.g., firstName, lastName, email) are provided. A similar suggestion was made previously and remains valid here.
274-280: Add input validation for timesheet entry fields
Consider validating properties like date format and integer ranges to avoid sending invalid data to the API. This repeats a past recommendation that remains unaddressed.
282-282: No issues with closing bracket
This final bracket properly terminates the export object.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
1-92: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling for better resilience.
The current implementation lacks error handling for the API call, which could lead to unhandled exceptions when network errors or API failures occur.
Apply this diff to add proper error handling:
async run({ $ }) { + // Validate name properties + if (!this.firstName || !this.lastName) { + throw new Error('First name and last name are required.'); + } + + try { const response = await this.hrCloud.createEmployee({ $, data: { xFirstName: this.firstName, xLastName: this.lastName, xEmail: this.email, xFullName: `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`, xPositionLookup: this.jobTitle, xDepartmentLookup: this.departmentId, xStartDate: this.startDate, xRecordStatus: this.recordStatus, xEmploymentStatusLookup: this.employmentStatus, xLocationLookup: this.locationId, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created employee: ${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to create employee: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
264-270: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for required employee fields.
The createEmployee method doesn't validate required fields before making the API request, which could result in failed API calls with cryptic error messages.
async createEmployee(args = {}) { + // Validate required fields + if (args.data) { + const { xFirstName, xLastName, xEmail } = args.data; + if (!xFirstName) { + throw new Error("First name is required"); + } + if (!xLastName) { + throw new Error("Last name is required"); + } + if (!xEmail) { + throw new Error("Email is required"); + } + // Basic email validation + if (!/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(xEmail)) { + throw new Error("Invalid email format"); + } + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/xEmployee", ...args, }); },
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
59-64: Fix inconsistent property name.The property is named
employmentStatusbut refers to theemploymentStatusIdpropDefinition, which could cause confusion.For consistency, either rename the property to match the propDefinition or adjust both to use the same naming convention:
employmentStatus: { propDefinition: [ hrCloud, - "employmentStatusId", + "employmentStatus", ], },components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
219-223: Remove or configure production logging.Console.log statements should be removed or replaced with a configurable logging system for production code.
try { - console.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); + // Use a configurable logging system instead of console.log + if (this.debug) { + $.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); + } const response = await axios($, config); return response;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
76-86:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify API field name convention.
The property names in the component (like
firstName) don't match the field names in the API request (prefixed with 'x'). Ensure this is the correct format expected by the HR Cloud API.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check API documentation or sample requests to verify field naming conventions curl -s "https://help.hrcloud.com/api/" | grep -A 10 "POST.*employee" | grep "field"Length of output: 82
Manual Verification Needed: Confirm API Field Naming Convention
The automated API documentation check did not return any results, so it's unclear whether the prefix "x" used for API field names is correct. Please manually verify that the HR Cloud API indeed requires this prefix for its fields.
- Action Required:
- Check the HR Cloud API documentation or confirm with the API maintainers that field names are expected to be prefixed with "x".
- Ensure that this mapping is intentional and aligns with the API contract.
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (2)
219-229: Enhance error handling in _makeRequest method.The current implementation only handles 404 errors specifically. Expand error handling to cover other common HTTP error codes for better diagnostics and user feedback.
try { console.log(`Making request to: ${config.url}`); const response = await axios($, config); return response; } catch (error) { console.error(`Error with request to ${path}: ${error.message}`); + const statusCode = error.response?.status; if (error.response?.status === 404) { throw new Error(`API endpoint not found (404): ${path}. Please verify the API URL structure in the HR Cloud documentation.`); } + if (statusCode === 401) { + throw new Error(`Authentication failed (401): Please check your API credentials.`); + } + if (statusCode === 403) { + throw new Error(`Access forbidden (403): You don't have permission to access ${path}.`); + } + if (statusCode >= 500) { + throw new Error(`Server error (${statusCode}): The HR Cloud server encountered an error. Please try again later.`); + } throw error; }
330-336: Add input validation for timesheet entries.The createTimesheetEntry method lacks validation for date formats, hours worked, and other fields before making the API request.
async createTimesheetEntry(args = {}) { + // Validate timesheet entry data + if (args.data) { + const { date, hours, employee_id, project_id } = args.data; + + // Check required fields + if (!date) throw new Error("Date is required"); + if (!hours) throw new Error("Hours are required"); + if (!employee_id) throw new Error("Employee ID is required"); + + // Validate date format (YYYY-MM-DD) + if (!/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/.test(date)) { + throw new Error("Invalid date format. Use YYYY-MM-DD"); + } + + // Validate hours (positive number, reasonable range) + if (typeof hours !== 'number' || hours <= 0 || hours > 24) { + throw new Error("Hours must be a positive number between 0 and 24"); + } + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/timesheet-entries", ...args, }); },
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (4)
6-191: Consider handling large datasets and pagination more gracefully.
Currently, eachoptionsmethod in the property definitions (e.g.,departmentId,employeeId, etc.) fetches only one page of results usingpage + 1. If an organization has many records, you might need robust handling of multiple pages (e.g., continuing to fetch pages until no more results remain) or the ability to filter results more granularly.
194-196: Consider externalizing the base URL for flexibility.
If you need to switch between production, staging, or dev environments, providing the base URL via environment variables or app configuration can help.
250-256: Potential pagination improvement.
If the HR Cloud API returns multiple pages of employees, consider iterating through them or exposing a page selection mechanism. Otherwise, this approach is acceptable.
323-329: Timesheet entries retrieval might need pagination.
Similar to employees, consider whether multiple pages need to be fetched.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/splunk/splunk.app.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs
- components/splunk/splunk.app.mjs
- components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs
- components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (14)
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (14)
197-203: Header configuration appears correct.
Referencingthis.$authfor consumer keys and secrets is consistent with Pipedream’s standard pattern, and the headers are well-defined for JSON payloads.
204-230: Remove or conditionally gate the debugging console.log.
Line 220 logs the request URL, which can clutter logs in production. If necessary, gate it behind a debug flag or remove it.
231-243: Webhook creation logic looks good.
The request is properly formed and follows the expected structure for creating webhooks in HR Cloud.
244-249: Webhook deletion logic is concise and clear.
Returns a direct response from the_makeRequestcall without extra overhead.
257-263: Single employee retrieval is straightforward.
Returnsresponse.employeewithout additional transformation, which is fine.
264-270: Add validation for required employee fields.
Please ensure that fields like first name, last name, and email are validated, if applicable, before making the request.
271-282: Department and job title retrieval methods are clear.
They reuse_makeRequestand map the data appropriately.
283-289: Leave requests retrieval is straightforward.
The method filters out the data fromresponse.leave_requests. Looks good.
290-296: Retrieving leave types is well-structured.
response.leave_types || []ensures no errors if none are returned.
297-302: Locations retrieval method looks fine.
Handles the returned data consistently with other endpoints.
303-308: Employment status retrieval is well-aligned.
Similar logic to other get methods, no issues found.
309-315: Leave request approval logic is concise.
Makes a straightforward PUT request to the expected endpoint.
316-322: Project data retrieval is consistent.
Usingresponse.projects || []for safety is a good pattern.
330-335: Add input validation for timesheet entries.
This was previously suggested. Validating hours, date format, and related data before sending the request can reduce API errors.
|
@dannyroosevelt I updated and tested the The We could switch the other 2 actions as well. Maybe do upsert-employee and create-task? Let me know if you'd like me to work on these. |
Thank you 🙏 I was testing out Claude Code to write this, and it apparently did some hallucinating (I didn't provide the context of API docs, so that makes sense). Yea, do you mind taking this over and applying whatever changes it needs? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
1-121: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation and error handling.
The action currently lacks input validation and error handling for API failures. This makes it vulnerable to runtime errors and provides poor feedback to users when things go wrong.
Consider implementing validation and error handling as previously suggested:
async run({ $ }) { + // Validate required fields + if (!this.firstName || !this.lastName || !this.email) { + throw new Error("First name, last name, and email are required fields"); + } + + try { const response = await this.hrCloud.createEmployee({ $, data: { xFirstName: this.firstName, xLastName: this.lastName, xEmail: this.email, xFullName: `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`, xPositionLookup: this.jobTitle, xDepartmentLookup: this.departmentId, xStartDate: this.startDate, xLocationLookup: this.locationId, xEmploymentStatusLookup: this.employmentStatus, xEmploymentNumber: this.employeeNumber, xRecordStatus: this.recordStatus, xAddress1: this.address, xCity: this.city, xState: this.state, xZipCode: this.zip, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created employee: ${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to create employee: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (2)
86-106: Add validation for optional fields and error handling for JSON parsingThe current implementation doesn't validate optional fields before sending them to the API, and the JSON parsing could fail without proper error handling.
async run({ $ }) { + const data = { + taskType: "task", + applicationCode: this.applicationCode, + title: this.title, + relatedToEmployeeIds: this.employeeIds, + assigneeType: this.assigneeType, + }; + + // Add conditional fields only if they exist + if (this.assignedEmployeeId) data.assignedEmployeeId = this.assignedEmployeeId; + if (this.hierarchyLevel) data.hierarchyLevel = this.hierarchyLevel; + if (this.fixedDueDate) data.fixedDueDate = this.fixedDueDate; + + // Handle relativeDueDate with proper error handling + if (this.relativeDueDate) { + try { + data.relativeDueDate = typeof this.relativeDueDate === "string" + ? JSON.parse(this.relativeDueDate) + : this.relativeDueDate; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Invalid JSON format for relativeDueDate: ${error.message}`); + } + } const response = await this.hrCloud.createTask({ $, - data: { - taskType: "task", - applicationCode: this.applicationCode, - title: this.title, - relatedToEmployeeIds: this.employeeIds, - assigneeType: this.assigneeType, - assignedEmployeeId: this.assignedEmployeeId, - hierarchyLevel: this.hierarchyLevel, - fixedDueDate: this.fixedDueDate, - relativeDueDate: typeof this.relativeDueDate === "string" - ? JSON.parse(this.relativeDueDate) - : this.relativeDueDate, - }, + data, });
60-66: Add minimum value for hierarchyLevelThe description states the hierarchy level should be "From 1 to 9", but only the maximum value is specified.
props.hierarchyLevel = { type: "integer", label: "Hierarchy Level", description: "Level of upper hierarchy level. From 1 to 9", + min: 1, max: 9, };components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs (1)
38-61: Make address fields optionalFor an update operation, the address-related fields (address, city, state, zip) should probably be optional, allowing users to update only specific employee information.
address: { propDefinition: [ hrCloud, "address", ], + optional: true, }, city: { propDefinition: [ hrCloud, "city", ], + optional: true, }, state: { propDefinition: [ hrCloud, "state", ], + optional: true, }, zip: { propDefinition: [ hrCloud, "zip", ], + optional: true, },components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (1)
282-305: Enhance paginate method with better error handling and validation.The
paginatemethod doesn't handle API errors well and assumesresourceFnreturns an array-like object with a length property.async *paginate({ resourceFn, params = {}, max, }) { + if (typeof resourceFn !== 'function') { + throw new Error('resourceFn must be a function'); + } + params = { ...params, page: 1, }; let total, count = 0; do { + try { const items = await resourceFn({ params, }); + + // Ensure items is an array-like object + if (!items || !Array.isArray(items)) { + console.warn(`Expected items to be an array, got ${typeof items}`); + break; + } + for (const item of items) { yield item; if (max && ++count >= max) { return; } } total = items?.length; params.page++; + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Error in paginate: ${error.message}`); + break; + } } while (total > 0); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/package.json(2 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-applicant-created/new-applicant-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-created/new-employee-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/hr_cloud/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/hr_cloud/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-created/new-employee-created.mjs
[error] 1-1: Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same! See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/hr_cloud/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs (1)
1-27: Well-structured source componentThe implementation follows a good pattern by extending the common base module and providing specific overrides for task-related functionality. The documentation link and proper deduplication strategy are appropriately included.
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1)
51-85: Good implementation of dynamic properties based on user selectionsThe
additionalPropsmethod nicely handles the dynamic UI based on the selected assignee type and application code.components/hr_cloud/sources/new-applicant-created/new-applicant-created.mjs (1)
1-27: Well-implemented source componentThe implementation correctly extends the common base module with applicant-specific functionality. The metadata generation looks appropriate with good field selection.
components/hr_cloud/hr_cloud.app.mjs (2)
193-218: Enhance error handling in _makeRequest method.While there is some error handling for 404 errors, it would be beneficial to handle other common HTTP status codes as well for better user feedback.
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, method = "GET", params = {}, data = {}, }) { const config = { method, url: `${this._baseUrl()}${path}`, headers: this._authHeaders(), params, data, }; try { const response = await axios($, config); return response; } catch (error) { console.error(`Error with request to ${path}: ${error.message}`); + const statusCode = error.response?.status; + const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; + + if (statusCode === 401) { + throw new Error(`Authentication failed: ${errorMessage}`); + } else if (statusCode === 403) { + throw new Error(`Access forbidden: ${errorMessage}`); if (error.response?.status === 404) { throw new Error(`API endpoint not found (404): ${path}. Please verify the API URL structure in the HR Cloud documentation.`); + } else if (statusCode >= 400 && statusCode < 500) { + throw new Error(`Client error: ${errorMessage}`); + } else if (statusCode >= 500) { + throw new Error(`HR Cloud server error: ${errorMessage}`); } throw error; } },
261-267: Add validation for required employee fields in createEmployee method.The
createEmployeemethod should validate required fields before making the API request to provide better error messages and avoid unnecessary API calls.createEmployee(args = {}) { + // Validate required employee fields + if (args.data) { + const { xFirstName, xLastName, xEmail } = args.data; + + if (!xFirstName) { + throw new Error("First name is required"); + } + + if (!xLastName) { + throw new Error("Last name is required"); + } + + if (!xEmail) { + throw new Error("Email is required"); + } + } + return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/xEmployee", ...args, }); },
components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-created/new-employee-created.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/hr_cloud/sources/new-employee-created/new-employee-created.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary
Test plan
Resolves #15812
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Documentation
New Features
Chores