Skip to content

New Components - email_verifier_api #15503

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

New Components - email_verifier_api #15503

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Feb 5, 2025

Resolves #10895

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new email verification feature that allows users to validate email addresses and receive confirmation of successful verification.
  • Chores
    • Updated component version and dependency settings to support the email verification functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 4:48pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 4:48pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 4:48pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new email verification feature. A new action module is added that defines a "Verify Email" action, which asynchronously calls the email verification API using a new verifyEmail method. Additionally, the email verifier API is refactored: the old authKeys method is removed, while _baseUrl, _makeRequest, and the public verifyEmail method are added. The component's version is updated and a dependency on @pipedream/platform is introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/email_verifier_api/actions/verify-email/verify-email.mjs Added a new "Verify Email" action with metadata and an asynchronous run method that calls emailVerifierApi.verifyEmail using a provided email.
components/email_verifier_api/email_verifier_api.app.mjs Removed authKeys; added private methods _baseUrl and _makeRequest; and introduced a public verifyEmail method to handle email verification requests.
components/email_verifier_api/package.json Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0, added a dependency on @pipedream/platform (^3.0.3), and modified the publish configuration to public access.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant A as Verify Email Action
    participant E as email_verifier_api
    U->>A: Request email verification (provides email)
    A->>E: Invoke verifyEmail({ email })
    E->>E: Call _makeRequest with email and API key
    E-->>A: Return verification data
    A-->>U: Provide summary message with verification result
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement email verification functionality (#10895)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

action

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

Poem

I’m a rabbit hopping through the code,
Verifying emails on this new road.
With actions swift and methods bright,
My nibbling code dances in delight.
Carrots and code, a duo so neat,
Hoppy changes make the process complete!
🐰✨

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/email_verifier_api/email_verifier_api.app.mjs (2)

8-10: Consider environment-specific API URLs.

The base URL is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable based on the environment.

-    _baseUrl() {
-      return "https://emailverifierapi.com/v2/";
-    },
+    _baseUrl() {
+      return this.$auth.base_url || "https://emailverifierapi.com/v2/";
+    },

25-34: Consider adding error handling.

The verifyEmail method should handle API errors gracefully.

     verifyEmail({
       $, email,
     }) {
+      if (!email) {
+        throw new Error("Email parameter is required");
+      }
       return this._makeRequest({
         $,
         params: {
           email,
         },
+      }).catch((error) => {
+        throw new Error(`Email verification failed: ${error.message}`);
+      });
     },
components/email_verifier_api/actions/verify-email/verify-email.mjs (1)

4-8: Consider semantic versioning for the initial release.

Since this is a new feature, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1.

-  version: "0.0.1",
+  version: "1.0.0",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea6d76b and f9dd928.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/email_verifier_api/actions/verify-email/verify-email.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/email_verifier_api/email_verifier_api.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/email_verifier_api/package.json (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/email_verifier_api/email_verifier_api.app.mjs (2)

11-24: LGTM! Well-structured request handling.

The _makeRequest method is well-implemented with:

  • Default context parameter
  • Proper authentication
  • Flexible parameter handling

1-1: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.

Let's ensure we're using a compatible version of the platform package.

✅ Verification successful

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the installed version of @pipedream/platform
npm list @pipedream/platform

Length of output: 78


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check @pipedream/platform version in package.json dependencies and devDependencies
echo "Checking @pipedream/platform version in package.json dependencies..."
jq '.dependencies["@pipedream/platform"]' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No dependencies found."

echo "Checking @pipedream/platform version in package.json devDependencies..."
jq '.devDependencies["@pipedream/platform"]' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No devDependencies found."

# Additionally, try to check the installed package version (if present) in node_modules
echo "Checking actual installed version from node_modules (if exists)..."
if [ -f "node_modules/@pipedream/platform/package.json" ]; then
  jq -r '.version' node_modules/@pipedream/platform/package.json
else
  echo "node_modules/@pipedream/platform/package.json not found."
fi

Length of output: 755


Package Version Verified: @pipedream/platform is declared with ^1.5.1 in package.json.

Our investigation confirms that the dependency is correctly specified in package.json. Although the sandbox environment didn’t show the installed package in node_modules, the declaration of "@pipedream/platform": "^1.5.1" indicates that the app is set to use a compatible version of the platform package.

components/email_verifier_api/package.json (2)

12-14: LGTM! Proper publish configuration.

The publishConfig with public access is correctly set.


3-3: Verify platform dependency compatibility.

The package uses @pipedream/platform ^3.0.3. Let's verify this is the latest stable version.

Also applies to: 15-17

✅ Verification successful

🌐 Web query:

What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform package?

Length of output: 2351


Platform dependency is compatible and up-to-date.

The web query confirms that the latest version of the @pipedream/platform npm package is 3.0.3—which matches the version specified in the package. No further changes are needed.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit e7dd5ab into master Feb 6, 2025
11 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-10895 branch February 6, 2025 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] email_verifier_api
2 participants