Skip to content

Conversation

GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao commented Jan 29, 2025

Improving the 'Share File' action to properly select either a file or a folder, and render props accordingly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Google Drive file/folder sharing action with a new option to specify whether sharing a file or folder
    • Dynamically show/hide file or folder ID based on user selection
  • Chores

    • Updated package version for Google Drive component

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 0:43am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 0:43am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 0:43am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the Google Drive action for file and folder sharing preferences. The main changes include adding a new useFileOrFolder property that allows users to specify whether they are sharing a file or a folder. The fileId and folderId properties are now hidden by default, with the additionalProps method dynamically controlling their visibility based on the selected type. The package version is also incrementally updated to reflect these modifications.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/google_drive/actions/add-file-sharing-preference/add-file-sharing-preference.mjs - Added useFileOrFolder property
- Changed fileId and folderId to hidden
- Updated additionalProps method to dynamically show/hide properties
components/google_drive/package.json - Bumped package version from 0.8.8 to 0.8.9

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Action
    participant GoogleDrive
    
    User->>Action: Select sharing type (File/Folder)
    Action->>Action: Update property visibility
    Action->>GoogleDrive: Share file/folder with specified permissions
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lcaresia
  • dannyroosevelt

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of sharing glee,
Google Drive, now more user-friendly!
File or folder, choose with care,
Permissions dance without a scare.
Code evolves, version takes flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/google_drive/actions/add-file-sharing-preference/add-file-sharing-preference.mjs (3)

34-43: Enhance the property description for better clarity.

While the property is well-structured, the description could be more specific about how this selection affects the visibility of file/folder input fields.

     useFileOrFolder: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Use File or Folder",
-      description: "Whether to use a file or a folder for this action",
+      description: "Select whether you want to share a file or a folder. This will show the appropriate input field based on your selection.",
       reloadProps: true,
       options: [
         "File",
         "Folder",
       ],
     },

52-52: Update property descriptions to reflect the new selection mechanism.

The descriptions still reference manual selection between file/folder, which is now handled by the useFileOrFolder property.

-      description: "The file to share. You must specify either a file or a folder.",
+      description: "The file to share. This field appears when 'File' is selected in 'Use File or Folder'.",

-      description: "The folder to share. You must specify either a file or a folder.",
+      description: "The folder to share. This field appears when 'Folder' is selected in 'Use File or Folder'.",

Also applies to: 63-63


79-85: Add defensive checks for the visibility logic.

The visibility logic should handle cases where useFileOrFolder is undefined or has an unexpected value.

-    if (useFileOrFolder === "File") {
-      previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
-      previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
-    } else if (useFileOrFolder === "Folder") {
-      previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
-      previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
-    }
+    // Default to hiding both fields
+    previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
+    previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
+
+    // Show appropriate field based on selection
+    switch(useFileOrFolder) {
+      case "File":
+        previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
+        break;
+      case "Folder":
+        previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
+        break;
+      default:
+        // Both fields remain hidden if no valid selection
+        break;
+    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 614a7ec and 2082a47.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/google_drive/actions/add-file-sharing-preference/add-file-sharing-preference.mjs (5 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/google_drive/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/google_drive/actions/add-file-sharing-preference/add-file-sharing-preference.mjs (1)

23-23: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.

The minor version increment (0.1.9 → 0.2.0) appropriately reflects the addition of the new file/folder selection feature.

Comment on lines +74 to 88
async additionalProps(previousProps) {
const {
fileId, folderId, type,
fileId, folderId, type, useFileOrFolder,
} = this;

if (useFileOrFolder === "File") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
} else if (useFileOrFolder === "Folder") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
}

const obj = {};
if (!(fileId || folderId) || !type) return obj;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the early return condition to prevent UI issues.

The early return condition if (!(fileId || folderId) || !type) checks for fileId/folderId before they're visible, which could prevent the UI from showing the input fields. This should only check for the type property.

     if (useFileOrFolder === "File") {
       previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
       previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
     } else if (useFileOrFolder === "Folder") {
       previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
       previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
     }

     const obj = {};
-    if (!(fileId || folderId) || !type) return obj;
+    if (!type) return obj;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async additionalProps(previousProps) {
const {
fileId, folderId, type,
fileId, folderId, type, useFileOrFolder,
} = this;
if (useFileOrFolder === "File") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
} else if (useFileOrFolder === "Folder") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
}
const obj = {};
if (!(fileId || folderId) || !type) return obj;
async additionalProps(previousProps) {
const {
fileId, folderId, type, useFileOrFolder,
} = this;
if (useFileOrFolder === "File") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = false;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = true;
} else if (useFileOrFolder === "Folder") {
previousProps.fileId.hidden = true;
previousProps.folderId.hidden = false;
}
const obj = {};
if (!type) return obj;

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit a25940d into master Jan 29, 2025
11 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the google-drive-patch branch January 29, 2025 01:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants