New Components - langbase #14980
New Components - langbase #14980
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and enhancements to the Langbase application, focusing on memory management actions. Three actions are defined: creating a memory, deleting a memory, and listing memories. Each action includes metadata and an asynchronous Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (2)
14-19: Swap 'name' and 'description' in memory options for clarityIn the
optionsmethod formemoryName, consider using thenameproperty as thelabelto make it more intuitive for users selecting a memory by its name.Apply this diff to adjust the mapping:
return memoryNames.map(({ name, description, }) => ({ - label: description, + label: name, value: name, }));
37-53: Ensure proper error handling in_makeRequestmethodCurrently, errors from the API requests are not being handled. Consider adding error handling to manage API errors gracefully and provide meaningful feedback to the user.
Apply this diff to include a try-catch block:
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { const { $ = this, path, headers, ...otherOpts } = opts; + try { return await axios($, { ...otherOpts, url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: { ...headers, "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.org_api_key}`, "Accept": "application/json", }, }); + } catch (error) { + $.throw(error); + } }components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs (1)
19-23: Handle potential errors when deleting a memoryConsider adding error handling to manage scenarios where the specified memory does not exist or the API call fails, providing meaningful feedback to the user.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({ $, memoryName: this.memoryName, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete memory named ${this.memoryName}`); + throw error; + } }components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (1)
25-37: Consider enhancing error handling and response validationWhile the implementation is generally good, consider these improvements:
- Validate the response before exporting the success message
- Add error handling for potential API failures
Consider applying this improvement:
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.app.createMemory({ $, data: { name: this.name, description: this.description, }, }); + if (!response?.id) { + throw new Error('Failed to create memory: Invalid response'); + } + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory ${this.name}`); return response; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs(1 hunks)components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs(1 hunks)components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs(1 hunks)components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/langbase/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/langbase/package.json (2)
3-3: Version update follows semantic versioning
Updating the version to 0.1.0 is appropriate given the addition of new features.
15-17: Verify that dependency '@pipedream/platform' is up to date
Ensure that the specified version of @pipedream/platform is the latest stable version to incorporate all recent fixes and features.
Run the following script to check the latest version:
✅ Verification successful
Dependency '@pipedream/platform' is already at the latest version (3.0.3)
The package.json specifies version ^3.0.3, which matches the latest available version on npm.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the latest version of '@pipedream/platform' on npm
npm view @pipedream/platform version
Length of output: 44
components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs (1)
1-22: Action implementation looks good
The list-memories action is correctly implemented and follows best practices.
components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM! Well-structured metadata with clear documentation.
The metadata is well-defined with a consistent format, descriptive name, and helpful documentation link.
1-1: Verify the imported app module implementation
The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the existence and implementation of the required createMemory method in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
Import statement is correctly implemented
The imported app module exists at components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs and contains the required createMemory method with the expected signature. The method implementation matches the usage pattern in the action component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the app module implementation
# Check if the app module exists and contains the createMemory method
# Check if the file exists
fd -e mjs "langbase.app.mjs$"
# Check for createMemory method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'createMemory({ $, data }) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the app module to verify the createMemory method
rg -U "createMemory.*?\{.*?\}" components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs -A 10
# Also check for any other potential method signatures
rg "createMemory" components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs
Length of output: 437
9-23: Verify prop definitions in the app module
The props structure looks correct, but we should verify the implementation of "name" and "description" propDefinitions in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
Props implementation verified successfully
The name and description prop definitions are correctly implemented in the app module:
name: string type with label "Name" and description "Name of the memory"description: string type with label "Description" and description "Short description of the memory"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify prop definitions in the app module
# Look for propDefinitions for name and description
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
name: {
$$$
},
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
description: {
$$$
},
$$$
}'
Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the app module and its prop definitions
# First, find the app module file
fd "app.mjs" --type f
# Then let's use ripgrep to search for propDefinitions with more context
rg -A 10 "propDefinitions.*=.*{"
Length of output: 73723
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the app module in the langbase component and check its prop definitions
fd "langbase.app.mjs" --type f
# Then let's look at its content
rg -l "propDefinitions" components/langbase/
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the langbase app module to find the prop definitions
cat components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs
Length of output: 1826
|
Merging this since it was already QA'd and this new PR had to be created due to conflicts |
Resolves #14085
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores