Skip to content

Conversation

dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Dec 12, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Timer property in the Google Drive component's webhook is now hidden from the interface.
    • Added a new property to specify drive type in the changes tracking component.
  • Version Updates

    • Updated version for the Google Drive component from 0.8.6 to 0.8.7.
    • Updated version for the new files instant feature from 0.1.10 to 0.1.11.
    • Updated version for the changes to specific files shared drive component from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4.
    • Updated version for the changes to specific files component from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4.
    • Updated version for the new or modified comments component from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3.
    • Updated version for the new or modified files component from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4.
    • Updated version for the new or modified folders component from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9.
    • Updated version for the new spreadsheet component from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 12, 2024 6:47pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 12, 2024 6:47pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 12, 2024 6:47pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the version numbers of several components within the Google Drive integration. The package.json file for the @pipedream/google_drive component has been updated from version 0.8.6 to 0.8.7. Additionally, multiple source files have had their version numbers incremented, including new-files-instant.mjs from 0.1.10 to 0.1.11, changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive.mjs and changes-to-specific-files.mjs from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4, new-or-modified-comments.mjs from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3, new-or-modified-files.mjs from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4, new-or-modified-folders.mjs from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9, and new-spreadsheet.mjs from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9. The common-webhook.mjs file has had its timer property modified to include a hidden attribute set to true.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/google_drive/package.json Version updated from 0.8.6 to 0.8.7.
components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs Added hidden: true to the timer property in the exported default object.
components/google_drive/sources/new-files-instant/new-files-instant.mjs Version updated from 0.1.10 to 0.1.11.
components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive.mjs Version updated from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4.
components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files/changes-to-specific-files.mjs Version updated from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4, added drive property in props, updated run method logic.
components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-comments/new-or-modified-comments.mjs Version updated from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3.
components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-files/new-or-modified-files.mjs Version updated from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4.
components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-folders/new-or-modified-folders.mjs Version updated from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9, modified getChanges method to check for headers.
components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs Version updated from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9, added shouldProcess method.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

action

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

🐇 In the meadow where bunnies play,
New versions hop in, hip-hip-hooray!
With timers hidden, they dance and twirl,
Google Drive's features now unfurl.
A leap in numbers, a joyful sight,
Let's celebrate these changes tonight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs (2)

Line range hint 15-15: Implementation doesn't match PR objective: Timer prop should be hidden.

The PR objective mentions hiding the timer prop for Google instant sources, but the timer prop is still inherited from newFilesInstant without the hidden attribute.

Apply this diff to hide the timer prop:

-    timer: newFilesInstant.props.timer,
+    timer: {
+      ...newFilesInstant.props.timer,
+      hidden: true,
+    },

Line range hint 71-82: Consider optimizing spreadsheet retrieval for multiple folders.

The current implementation processes folders sequentially and may hit rate limits or perform slowly with many folders. Consider using Promise.all for parallel processing with a concurrency limit.

Here's a suggested optimization:

     async getSpreadsheets(limit) {
       const foldersIds = this.folders;
 
       if (!foldersIds.length) {
         const opts = this.getSpreadsheetsFromFolderOpts("root");
         const { files } = await this.googleDrive.listFilesInPage(null, opts);
         return this.getSpreadsheetsFromFiles(files, limit);
       }
 
-      return foldersIds.reduce(async (spreadsheets, folderId) => {
-        const opts = this.getSpreadsheetsFromFolderOpts(folderId);
-        const { files } = await this.googleDrive.listFilesInPage(null, opts);
-        const nextSpreadsheets = await this.getSpreadsheetsFromFiles(files, limit);
-        return (await spreadsheets).concat(nextSpreadsheets);
-      }, []);
+      const batchSize = 3; // Process 3 folders at a time
+      const results = [];
+      
+      for (let i = 0; i < foldersIds.length; i += batchSize) {
+        const batch = foldersIds.slice(i, i + batchSize);
+        const batchResults = await Promise.all(
+          batch.map(async (folderId) => {
+            const opts = this.getSpreadsheetsFromFolderOpts(folderId);
+            const { files } = await this.googleDrive.listFilesInPage(null, opts);
+            return this.getSpreadsheetsFromFiles(files, limit);
+          })
+        );
+        results.push(...batchResults.flat());
+        if (results.length >= limit) break;
+      }
+      
+      return results.slice(0, limit);
components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-files/new-or-modified-files.mjs (1)

Line range hint 1-150: Consider enhancing error handling and logging

While reviewing the entire file, I noticed a few areas where we could improve error handling and logging:

  1. The processChanges method could benefit from try-catch blocks around API calls
  2. The console.log statements should be replaced with structured logging

Consider applying these improvements:

 async processChanges(changedFiles, headers) {
   const changes = await this.getChanges(headers);
   const filteredFiles = this.checkMinimumInterval(changedFiles);

   for (const file of filteredFiles) {
+    try {
       file.parents = (await this.googleDrive.getFile(file.id, {
         fields: "parents",
       })).parents;

-      console.log(file); // see what file was processed
+      this.$.logger.info("Processing file", { file });

       if (!this.shouldProcess(file)) {
-        console.log(`Skipping file ${file.name}`);
+        this.$.logger.info("Skipping file", { fileName: file.name });
         continue;
       }

       const eventToEmit = {
         file,
         ...changes,
       };
       const meta = this.generateMeta(file, headers);
       this.$emit(eventToEmit, meta);
+    } catch (error) {
+      this.$.logger.error("Error processing file", { 
+        fileName: file.name,
+        error: error.message,
+      });
+    }
   }
 },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cba8932 and c6682fe.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files/changes-to-specific-files.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-comments/new-or-modified-comments.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-files/new-or-modified-files.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-folders/new-or-modified-folders.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive.mjs
  • components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-comments/new-or-modified-comments.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs (1)

9-9: LGTM: Version bump is consistent.

The version increment from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9 aligns with the changes across the Google Drive components.

components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-files/new-or-modified-files.mjs (2)

27-27: LGTM: Version bump is consistent

The version increment from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4 aligns with the changes described in the PR.


Line range hint 1-150: Verify the timer property changes

Since this component extends the common webhook implementation, we should verify that the timer property hiding is properly implemented in the imported common-webhook.mjs file.

✅ Verification successful

Timer property is correctly implemented and hidden

The verification confirms that the timer property is properly implemented in common-webhook.mjs. The timer property is:

  • Defined with appropriate configuration for Google Drive API's push notification renewal
  • Marked as hidden: true to prevent user modification
  • Set with static interval using WEBHOOK_SUBSCRIPTION_RENEWAL_SECONDS
  • Correctly handled in the run() method for subscription renewal
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify timer property changes in common-webhook.mjs

# Check the timer property definition in common-webhook.mjs
rg -A 5 "timer.*{" components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

Length of output: 151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find timer-related code in common-webhook.mjs

# First, let's see if the file exists and check its content
cat components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

# As a backup, let's also search for timer-related patterns without regex
rg -i "timer" components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

Length of output: 6936

components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files/changes-to-specific-files.mjs (3)

18-18: LGTM: Version bump follows semantic versioning.

The version increment from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4 aligns with the changes in related components.


Line range hint 26-33: LGTM: Well-structured drive property definition.

The drive prop is well-defined with:

  • Clear type definition
  • Informative description
  • Proper default value
  • Helpful guidance for shared drive users

Line range hint 1-7: Verify component inheritance and shared drive handling.

Let's verify that this component properly extends the shared drive variant and that the new drive prop doesn't introduce breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Component inheritance and drive handling are properly implemented

The code analysis shows that:

  • The component correctly extends the shared drive variant using the spread operator (...changesToSpecificFiles)
  • The drive prop is properly added with MY_DRIVE_VALUE as default, which is defined in the constants file
  • The inheritance maintains all necessary hooks, methods, and props from the base component
  • The description clearly guides users to use the shared drive variant for shared drive files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify component inheritance and usage patterns

# Check for any direct usage of this component in other files
rg -l "google_drive-changes-to-specific-files" --type js

# Check for any imports of the shared drive variant
rg -l "changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive" --type js

# Verify the MY_DRIVE_VALUE constant usage
rg "MY_DRIVE_VALUE" --type js

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive analysis with different search patterns

# Check the implementation of both components
echo "=== Changes to specific files implementation ==="
cat "components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files/changes-to-specific-files.mjs"

echo -e "\n=== Shared drive variant implementation ==="
cat "components/google_drive/sources/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive/changes-to-specific-files-shared-drive.mjs"

# Check constants file
echo -e "\n=== Constants file ==="
cat "components/google_drive/common/constants.mjs"

# Search for any references to these components in the codebase
echo -e "\n=== References to components ==="
rg -l "changes-to-specific-files" --type js

# Look for drive type handling patterns
rg "driveId|MY_DRIVE" --type js

Length of output: 21385

components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-folders/new-or-modified-folders.mjs (3)

Line range hint 11-11: Verify timer property changes in common webhook implementation

The PR objective mentions hiding the timer prop for Google instant sources. Since this component inherits from common-webhook.mjs, we should verify the timer-related changes there.

✅ Verification successful

Timer property is already hidden in the common webhook implementation

The verification confirms that the timer property in common-webhook.mjs is already properly configured with hidden: true, which aligns with the PR objective of hiding the timer prop for Google instant sources.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check timer-related changes in common webhook implementation
# Expected: Timer prop should be hidden in the common implementation

echo "Checking timer property in common webhook:"
rg -A 10 'timer:' components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

echo "Checking recent changes to common webhook:"
git log -p components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs | head -n 50

Length of output: 671


Line range hint 1-120: Ensure changes align with PR objectives

The file implements both webhook-based notifications and timer-based channel renewal. While hiding the timer prop makes sense for a cleaner UI, ensure that the timer functionality for channel renewal remains operational as it's crucial for maintaining webhook notifications.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the timer functionality.


Timer functionality for channel renewal is properly preserved

The verification shows that the timer functionality is fully intact in the common-webhook.mjs file, which is extended by the new-or-modified-folders source. Specifically:

  • The timer prop is correctly configured with WEBHOOK_SUBSCRIPTION_RENEWAL_SECONDS interval
  • The renewal logic is implemented in the run() method, handling timer-triggered events
  • The timer prop is only hidden from the UI (hidden: true) but remains functional
  • The channel subscription renewal process is properly maintained through renewSubscription() method
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the timer functionality is preserved in the implementation
# Expected: Timer-based channel renewal code should still be present

echo "Checking timer-related functionality:"
ast-grep --pattern 'async renewChannelSubscription() {
  $$$
}'  components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

Length of output: 201


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common-webhook.mjs file content to verify timer functionality
echo "Checking common-webhook.mjs content:"
cat components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

# Also check for any props related to timer configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for timer-related configurations:"
rg "timer" components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

Length of output: 7117


23-23: Verify version bump consistency across related files

The version has been bumped from "0.1.8" to "0.1.9". Let's ensure this is consistent with other related files.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify if this version bump is coordinated with related components. I notice that new-spreadsheet has the same version "0.1.9", but I should check the git history to see if these changes are part of the same update.

Note: I realize after writing this that git log -p operations are discouraged. Let me try a different approach:


Let me check the common webhook file to verify the timer prop changes mentioned in the PR objectives.


Version bump and timer prop changes are consistent with PR objectives

The changes are verified and align with the PR objectives:

  • Version bump from 0.1.8 to 0.1.9 is coordinated between new-or-modified-folders and new-spreadsheet components
  • Timer prop is now hidden in the common webhook implementation (common-webhook.mjs) which affects all inheriting components
  • The changes implement the PR objective of "Hiding timer prop for Google instant sources"
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version numbers in related Google Drive source files
# Expected: All files should have coordinated version updates

echo "Checking version numbers in Google Drive source files:"
rg -A 1 'version: "0' components/google_drive/sources/

Length of output: 1605


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent changes to version numbers in these files
git log -L :version:components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-folders/new-or-modified-folders.mjs -L :version:components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs --oneline -n 3

Length of output: 0


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the PR changes for these files
git diff origin/master -- components/google_drive/sources/new-or-modified-folders/new-or-modified-folders.mjs components/google_drive/sources/new-spreadsheet/new-spreadsheet.mjs

Length of output: 1664


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check changes to the common webhook file
git diff origin/master -- components/google_drive/sources/common-webhook.mjs

# Also check if there are any other files that might contain timer prop changes
rg -B2 -A2 'timer.*prop' components/google_drive/sources/

Length of output: 1087

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt merged commit 72196ff into master Dec 12, 2024
11 checks passed
@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt deleted the danny/hide-timer-prop-google-sources branch December 12, 2024 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant