Skip to content

Conversation

dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Dec 11, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an optional query parameter include_credentials for account-related API endpoints.
  • Documentation

    • Updated examples for account endpoints to demonstrate the new parameter.
    • Enhanced guidance on securely handling credentials and filtering account data.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 11, 2024 7:04pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 11, 2024 7:04pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 11, 2024 7:04pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request enhances the documentation for the Pipedream Connect API by introducing a new optional query parameter, include_credentials, for the GET /{project_id}/accounts and GET /{project_id}/accounts/{account_id} endpoints. The documentation now includes detailed instructions on using this parameter, security implications, and updated examples demonstrating its use. Additionally, response examples have been expanded to show the differences when credentials are included versus when they are not, improving clarity regarding credential handling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx - Added include_credentials boolean parameter (optional) for GET /{project_id}/accounts
- Added include_credentials boolean parameter (optional) for GET /{project_id}/accounts/{account_id}
- Updated examples for both endpoints to demonstrate the new parameter and its implications for security.
- Expanded response examples to illustrate differences when credentials are included.

Possibly related PRs

  • Retrieve credentials for a single account #14657: This PR introduces the include_credentials parameter in the getAccountById method, which is directly related to the main PR's addition of the include_credentials query parameter in the API documentation for account retrieval endpoints.

Suggested reviewers

  • dylburger

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
New parameters sprout, as fresh as can be.
Credentials now dance, in docs they reside,
With examples so clear, there's nothing to hide.
So let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
In the world of APIs, we’re having a ball! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (2)

336-343: Add a security warning about credential handling.

While the code examples are correct, it would be beneficial to add a more prominent security warning about credential handling, perhaps as a callout block before the examples.

+ <Callout type="warning">
+ **Security Warning**: When retrieving account credentials, ensure they are:
+ - Never logged or stored in plaintext
+ - Never exposed in client-side code or responses
+ - Stored securely using appropriate encryption
+ - Accessed only when necessary
+ </Callout>

Also applies to: 359-366, 382-392


575-577: Consider adding TypeScript type annotations.

While the examples are correct, adding TypeScript type annotations for the parameters would improve developer experience.

-const account = await pd.getAccountById(accountId, {
+const account = await pd.getAccountById(accountId, {
+  app?: string;
+  external_user_id?: string;
+  include_credentials?: boolean;

Also applies to: 600-602, 622-631

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba845b1 and 769ace4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (2)

308-316: LGTM! Clear and secure documentation of the new parameter.

The documentation for the include_credentials parameter is well-structured and includes an important security callout about OAuth client requirements.


479-524: LGTM! Comprehensive response example with credentials.

The example response with credentials is well-structured and includes all necessary fields. The sensitive fields are properly masked with "xxx" and "xxxxxxxx".

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (2)

Line range hint 401-528: Example responses are comprehensive but could use formatting improvements.

The example responses effectively show the difference between responses with and without credentials. However, consider adding line breaks between major sections of the JSON response for better readability.

 {
   "page_info": {
     "total_count": 1,
     "count": 1,
     "start_cursor": "YXBuX0JtaEJKSm0",
     "end_cursor": "YXBuX1YxaE1lTE0",
   }, 
+
   "data": {
     "accounts":[
       {
         "id": "apn_MGhvgnX",

694-694: Consider removing or obfuscating the user ID in example.

The example response includes a specific user ID "gcostanza" which might be better replaced with a generic placeholder like "user123".

-    "user_id": "gcostanza",
+    "user_id": "user123",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 769ace4 and ba30caa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (10 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (3)

308-320: Documentation for include_credentials parameter is well structured.

The documentation clearly explains the parameter's purpose and includes appropriate security warnings. The additional info callout about OAuth client requirements is particularly helpful.


340-347: Examples are consistent across all language implementations.

The TypeScript, Node.js, and cURL examples consistently demonstrate the usage of the new include_credentials parameter. The comments about not returning credentials to the client are appropriately emphasized across all examples.

Also applies to: 363-370, 386-396


583-585: Verify consistency of optional parameters across endpoints.

The documentation shows app and external_user_id as optional parameters for the single account endpoint, but these aren't listed in the parameters section. This could be confusing for API users.

Also applies to: 608-610, 630-639

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the implementation details to verify the parameter consistency.


Let me analyze the complete API documentation to verify the parameter consistency.


After analyzing the API documentation, I can now provide a definitive response about the parameter consistency.

Parameters are correctly documented but in different sections

The app and external_user_id parameters shown in the code example are indeed documented in the API reference:

  • app is documented under "Query parameters" for the "List all accounts" endpoint
  • external_user_id is documented under "Query parameters" for the "List all accounts" endpoint
  • include_credentials is documented under "Query parameters" for both "List all accounts" and "Retrieve account details by ID" endpoints

All parameters are properly supported in the implementation and consistently documented across the API reference.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these parameters are actually supported in the implementation

# Search for parameter handling in the codebase
rg -A 5 "GET.*\/accounts\/\{account_id\}"

Length of output: 146


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for routes or handlers related to accounts
rg -l "accounts.*account_id"

# Search for parameter documentation in API docs
rg -A 10 "parameters.*account" "docs-v2"

# Search for account-related code patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'app: $_'

Length of output: 367


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific API documentation content
cat "docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx"

# Also check the REST API documentation for parameter consistency
cat "docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx"

Length of output: 86496

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant