Skip to content

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Dec 9, 2024

Resolves #14874

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new property topic in the new-event-emitted component for enhanced event tracking.
    • Added optional properties productType and tags in the new-product-updated component for filtering capabilities.
  • Version Updates

    • Incremented version numbers across multiple components, including new-cancelled-order, new-customer-created, new-draft-order, new-event-emitted, new-order-created, new-paid-order, new-product-created, new-product-updated, new-refund-created, new-updated-customer, new-updated-order, new-fulfillment-event, and domo.app.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified the control flow in the run method by removing unnecessary metadata checks in the webhook component.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 10, 2024 8:07pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 10, 2024 8:07pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 10, 2024 8:07pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@michelle0927 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7c387b and f9f6912.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-order-fulfilled/new-order-fulfilled.mjs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several updates to the shopify_developer_app component. Key changes include version increments for multiple source files, reflecting updates from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5 for several modules and from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2 for others. Notably, the run method in the webhook.mjs file has been simplified by removing a metadata validity check, allowing relevant resources to be emitted regardless of metadata validity. Additionally, a new property topic was added to the new-event-emitted.mjs file.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/shopify_developer_app/package.json Updated version from 0.5.0 to 0.5.1.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs Modified run method to remove metadata validity check.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-cancelled-order/new-cancelled-order.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-customer-created/new-customer-created.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-draft-order/new-draft-order.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-event-emitted/new-event-emitted.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5; added topic property.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-order-created/new-order-created.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-paid-order/new-paid-order.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-updated/new-product-updated.mjs Updated version from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3; added productType and tags properties; added generateMeta method.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-refund-created/new-refund-created.mjs Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-customer/new-updated-customer.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-order/new-updated-order.mjs Updated version from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5.
components/domo/domo.app.mjs Added a newline at the end of the file.
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-fulfillment-event/new-fulfillment-event.mjs Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
The new-event-emitted trigger should emit events correctly (issue #14874).

Possibly related PRs

  • Shopify Developer App - New Product Updated #12472: This PR involves updates to the package.json and introduces a new source component for handling updated products, which may relate to the version updates in the main PR.
  • Shopify (OAuth) - Update Metafield action #14076: This PR modifies the new-fulfillment-event.mjs file to change its functionality from handling shipment events to fulfillment events, which aligns with the changes in the main PR regarding fulfillment logic.
  • Shopify - action modifications #14894: This PR updates the Shopify actions, including renaming and creating triggers related to order fulfillment, which is directly relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding fulfillment events.

Suggested labels

User submitted, ai-assisted

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New events hop in, brightening the day.
With versions that leap, and checks that are few,
Emitting the magic, we’re ready anew!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For every small change brings the future near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)

Line range hint 46-86: Consider removing or documenting the unused checkMetaFields method

The checkMetaFields method is no longer used after the recent change. Consider either:

  1. Removing it if it's truly obsolete
  2. Adding documentation explaining why it's retained
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-event-emitted/new-event-emitted.mjs (2)

10-10: Document version bump rationale

The version bump from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5 suggests a breaking change. Please document the rationale for this version increment in the changelog.


Line range hint 24-31: Consider adding event validation

The generateMeta method creates metadata without any validation of the event data. Consider adding basic validation to ensure event integrity.

 generateMeta() {
   const ts = Date.now();
+  if (!this.topic) {
+    throw new Error("Event topic is required");
+  }
   return {
     id: ts,
-    summary: `New Event Emitted at ${new Date(ts)}.`,
+    summary: `New ${this.topic} Event Emitted at ${new Date(ts)}.`,
     ts,
   };
 },
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-updated/new-product-updated.mjs (2)

Line range hint 33-42: Optimize tag filtering performance

The current tag filtering implementation has O(n²) complexity and could be optimized. Consider using Set for better performance.

 isRelevant(resource) {
   let relevant = true;
   if (this.productType && resource.product_type !== this.productType) {
     relevant = false;
   }
   if (this.tags?.length) {
-    this.tags.forEach((tag) => {
-      if (!resource.tags?.includes(tag)) {
-        relevant = false;
-      }
-    });
+    const resourceTags = new Set(resource.tags ?? []);
+    relevant = this.tags.every((tag) => resourceTags.has(tag));
   }
   return relevant;
 }

Line range hint 43-50: Add null safety to generateMeta

The generateMeta method should handle cases where resource.updated_at is undefined.

 generateMeta(resource) {
-  const ts = Date.parse(resource.updated_at);
+  const ts = resource.updated_at ? Date.parse(resource.updated_at) : Date.now();
   return {
     id: `${resource.id}-${ts}`,
-    summary: `Product Updated ${resource.id}`,
+    summary: `Product ${resource.id ?? 'Unknown'} Updated`,
     ts,
   };
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 330ef84 and c3e0878.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-cancelled-order/new-cancelled-order.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-customer-created/new-customer-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-draft-order/new-draft-order.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-event-emitted/new-event-emitted.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-order-created/new-order-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-paid-order/new-paid-order.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-updated/new-product-updated.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-refund-created/new-refund-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-shipment/new-shipment.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-customer/new-updated-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-order/new-updated-order.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
  • components/shopify_developer_app/package.json
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-shipment/new-shipment.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-customer/new-updated-customer.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-refund-created/new-refund-created.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-updated-order/new-updated-order.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-customer-created/new-customer-created.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-draft-order/new-draft-order.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-paid-order/new-paid-order.mjs
  • components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-cancelled-order/new-cancelled-order.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/shopify_developer_app/sources/new-order-created/new-order-created.mjs (2)

10-10: ⚠️ Potential issue

Version bump without addressing the reported issue

While the version has been incremented to "0.0.5", there are no changes addressing the core issue where events are not being emitted despite webhook payloads being visible in logs. The problem was reported to be related to metafield namespaces configuration.

Let's examine the webhook handling in the common module:


Line range hint 1-35: Verify event emission in the common webhook implementation

The event emission logic relies heavily on the common webhook implementation. Since the issue reports that webhook payloads are visible but events aren't emitted, we should verify:

  1. The webhook handler's event emission logic
  2. Any conditions that might prevent event emission
  3. The metafield namespace configuration affecting this behavior

Let's analyze the webhook implementation:

components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)

113-115: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the impact of removing metafield validation

The removal of checkMetaFields validation changes how events are processed. While this fixes the event emission issue, we should ensure this doesn't introduce unintended side effects.

✅ Verification successful

After analyzing the webhook.mjs file content and searching for any dependencies, I can now provide a conclusive response about the impact of removing the metafield validation.

Removal of metafield validation is safe to proceed

The checkMetaFields method was a validation step that checked if metafields matched configured namespaces, but:

  • The method exists but is not referenced anywhere else in the codebase
  • The validation was overly restrictive, causing valid webhook events to be dropped
  • The method remains in the code for backward compatibility but its removal from the event emission logic is safe

The change aligns with the webhook's primary purpose of emitting events based on resource relevance (isRelevant) while maintaining the core webhook validation through isWebhookEventValid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dependencies on metafield validation
rg -l "checkMetaFields" --type js

# Check for any existing metafield-related tests
rg -l "test.*metafield" --type js

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for metafield-related code
rg -i "metafield" --type js -A 3

# Also search for any usage patterns of isRelevant with validation
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($check && this.isRelevant($_)) { $$$ }'

# Check the history of the webhook.mjs file
git log --oneline components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs

# Look for any test files related to webhooks
fd "webhook.*test" --type f

Length of output: 128


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the webhook.mjs file content to understand the context better
cat components/shopify_developer_app/sources/common/webhook.mjs

# Search for any files that might extend or implement this webhook class
rg -l "extends.*webhook" --type js

# Look for any documentation files that might mention metafields
fd "README|CHANGELOG" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 65899

@michelle0927 michelle0927 requested review from jcortes and removed request for jcortes December 12, 2024 21:46
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927 lgtm!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 7f9b6a4 into master Dec 16, 2024
11 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-14874 branch December 16, 2024 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Shopify - New Event Emitted (Instant) not emitting events
2 participants