Salesforce Upsert Record #14862
Salesforce Upsert Record #14862
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new action for creating or updating Salesforce records in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (2)
90-91: Add missing trailing comma after object propertyA trailing comma is missing after the
updateOnlyproperty in theparamsobject, which can help with cleaner git diffs and comply with style guidelines.Apply this diff:
params: { updateOnly +},🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 90-91: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 90-90:
Missing trailing comma
97-97: Use consistent quotation marks and format the ternary expressionReplace single quotes with double quotes inside the template literal to maintain consistency. Additionally, format the ternary expression for better readability.
Apply this diff:
-$.export("$summary", `Successfully ${response.created ? 'created' : 'updated'} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`); +$.export("$summary", `Successfully ${ + response.created ? "created" : "updated" +} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`);🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 97-97: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 97-97: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 97-97: Strings must use doublequote.
(quotes)
[error] 97-97: Strings must use doublequote.
(quotes)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 97-97:
Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression
[failure] 97-97:
Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression
[failure] 97-97:
Strings must use doublequote
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs(1 hunks)components/salesforce_rest_api/salesforce_rest_api.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
[error] 36-36: This line has a length of 102. Maximum allowed is 100.
(max-len)
[error] 36-36: Expected parentheses around arrow function argument.
(arrow-parens)
[error] 36-36: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 36-36: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 36-36: A space is required before '}'.
(object-curly-spacing)
[error] 38-39: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 90-91: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 97-97: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 97-97: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 97-97: Strings must use doublequote.
(quotes)
[error] 97-97: Strings must use doublequote.
(quotes)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
[warning] 11-11:
{{ts}} macro should be removed before committing
[failure] 36-36:
This line has a length of 102. Maximum allowed is 100
[failure] 36-36:
Expected parentheses around arrow function argument
[failure] 36-36:
Expected a line break after this opening brace
[failure] 36-36:
Expected a line break before this closing brace
[failure] 36-36:
A space is required before '}'
[failure] 38-38:
Missing trailing comma
[failure] 90-90:
Missing trailing comma
[failure] 97-97:
Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression
[failure] 97-97:
Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression
[failure] 97-97:
Strings must use doublequote
| key: "salesforce_rest_api-upsert-record", | ||
| name: "Upsert Record", | ||
| description: "Create or update a record of a given object. [See the documentation](https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_rest.meta/api_rest/dome_upsert.htm)", | ||
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace the {{ts}} macro in the version field
The version field currently includes the {{ts}} macro, which should be replaced before committing to avoid unintended placeholders in your code.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-version: "0.0.{{ts}}",
+version: "0.0.1",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", | |
| version: "0.0.1", |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[warning] 11-11:
{{ts}} macro should be removed before committing
| const externalIdFieldOptions = fields.filter(field => field.externalId).map(({ label, name}) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value: name | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enclose arrow function arguments in parentheses and format the object
For better readability and to comply with style guidelines, enclose the arrow function argument field in parentheses and format the returned object to include line breaks and proper spacing.
Apply this diff to address the issues:
-const externalIdFieldOptions = fields.filter(field => field.externalId).map(({ label, name}) => ({
- label,
- value: name
-}));
+const externalIdFieldOptions = fields
+ .filter((field) => field.externalId)
+ .map(({ label, name }) => ({
+ label,
+ value: name,
+ }));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const externalIdFieldOptions = fields.filter(field => field.externalId).map(({ label, name}) => ({ | |
| label, | |
| value: name | |
| })); | |
| const externalIdFieldOptions = fields | |
| .filter((field) => field.externalId) | |
| .map(({ label, name }) => ({ | |
| label, | |
| value: name, | |
| })); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 36-36: This line has a length of 102. Maximum allowed is 100.
(max-len)
[error] 36-36: Expected parentheses around arrow function argument.
(arrow-parens)
[error] 36-36: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 36-36: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 36-36: A space is required before '}'.
(object-curly-spacing)
[error] 38-39: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 36-36:
This line has a length of 102. Maximum allowed is 100
[failure] 36-36:
Expected parentheses around arrow function argument
[failure] 36-36:
Expected a line break after this opening brace
[failure] 36-36:
Expected a line break before this closing brace
[failure] 36-36:
A space is required before '}'
[failure] 38-38:
Missing trailing comma
| async upsertRecord(sobjectName, { | ||
| externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, ...args | ||
| }) { | ||
| const url = `${this._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`; | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| url, | ||
| method: "PATCH", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
URL-encode externalIdValue to handle special characters
When constructing the URL for the upsert operation, externalIdValue should be URL-encoded to correctly handle special characters, preventing potential errors in the request.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const url = `${this._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`;
+const encodedExternalIdValue = encodeURIComponent(externalIdValue);
+const url = `${this._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${encodedExternalIdValue}`;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (1)
84-96: Remove unused variables from destructuring assignment in the 'run' methodSeveral variables are destructured from
thisbut are not used in the method body. Removing these variables can help clean up the code and eliminate the need to disable theno-unused-varsESLint rule.Apply this diff to address the issue:
-/* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ const { - salesforce, objectType, getAdditionalFields: getData, - convertFieldsToProps, - docsInfo, - additionalFields, externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, updateOnly, ...data } = this; -/* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs(1 hunks)components/salesforce_rest_api/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/salesforce_rest_api/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (1)
109-111: Verify the reliability of 'response.created' property
Ensure that the response.created property is consistently returned by the Salesforce API and accurately indicates whether a record was created or updated. This will guarantee that the summary message provides correct information to the user.
Run the following script to verify the usage of response.created in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Salesforce API response structure and its documentation within the codebase.
Let me try one more search to find any test files or documentation with the correct path pattern:
Let me try one final search focusing on the Salesforce API documentation within the codebase:
Based on the searches performed, I can now generate the final response since we have enough context about the Salesforce API response structure and its usage in the codebase.
The response.created property is reliable for determining record creation vs update
The response.created property is a standard field returned by Salesforce's REST API when using the upsert operation. This is a well-established pattern in the Salesforce API that reliably indicates whether a new record was created (true) or an existing record was updated (false).
The usage in the summary message is correct and provides accurate information to the user about the operation's outcome.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usages of 'response.created' to confirm its consistency.
# Test: Find all occurrences of 'response.created' in Salesforce actions.
rg -A 3 -B 3 'response\.created' components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/
Length of output: 771
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or type definitions related to Salesforce API responses
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Created|created.*response" components/salesforce_rest_api/
# Look for test files that might validate this behavior
fd -e test.mjs -e spec.mjs -X rg -l "response.*created" {} \; components/salesforce_rest_api/
# Check if there's any documentation in README or similar files
fd -e md -X rg -l "response.*created" {} \; components/salesforce_rest_api/
Length of output: 7164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files that might validate this behavior
cd components/salesforce_rest_api && fd -e test.mjs -e spec.mjs -X rg -l "response.*created" {}
# Look for documentation about the upsert endpoint
rg -A 5 -B 5 "upsert.*response|upsert.*endpoint" components/salesforce_rest_api/
Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API documentation and type definitions
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Salesforce.*API|@returns.*response" components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/
# Look for any comments or JSDoc about the response structure
ast-grep --pattern 'const response = $_'
Length of output: 66348
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (3)
70-71: Add missing trailing commaAdd a trailing comma to maintain consistency with the codebase style.
- content: "If you don't see any fields in the above list, you probably need to create one in Salesforce's Object Manager. Only a field marked as an external id field can be used to identify a record." + content: "If you don't see any fields in the above list, you probably need to create one in Salesforce's Object Manager. Only a field marked as an external id field can be used to identify a record.",🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 70-71: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
42-44: Optimize field filtering logicConsider combining the filter conditions for better readability and performance.
- const requiredFields = fields.filter((field) => { - return field.createable && field.updateable && !field.nillable && !field.defaultedOnCreate; - }); + const requiredFields = fields.filter((field) => + field.createable && + field.updateable && + !field.nillable && + !field.defaultedOnCreate + );
103-114: Enhance error handling for upsert operationWhile the basic error handling through async/await is present, consider adding specific error handling for common Salesforce API errors.
+ try { const response = await this.upsertRecord(objectType, { $, externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, params: { updateOnly, }, data: { ...data, ...getData(), }, }); + } catch (error) { + if (error.response?.data?.[0]?.errorCode === 'INVALID_EXTERNAL_ID_FIELD') { + throw new Error(`Invalid external ID field: ${externalIdFieldName}. Please ensure the field exists and is marked as an external ID in Salesforce.`); + } + throw error; + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
[error] 70-71: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (2)
1-24: LGTM! Well-documented action setup.
The imports, metadata, and props configuration are well-structured. The documentation link in the description helps users understand the Salesforce upsert operation.
27-36:
Fix undefined method reference in URL construction
The _sObjectTypeApiUrl method is not defined in the current context. This will cause runtime errors.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- const url = `${this._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`;
+ const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (3)
42-44: Consider breaking down the field filter conditionsThe field filtering logic could be more readable by breaking down the conditions:
-const requiredFields = fields.filter((field) => { - return field.createable && field.updateable && !field.nillable && !field.defaultedOnCreate; -}); +const requiredFields = fields.filter((field) => { + const isModifiable = field.createable && field.updateable; + const isRequired = !field.nillable && !field.defaultedOnCreate; + return isModifiable && isRequired; +});
70-71: Add missing trailing commaAdd a trailing comma to maintain consistency with the codebase style.
- content: "If you don't see any fields in the above list, you probably need to create one in Salesforce's Object Manager. Only a field marked as an external id field can be used to identify a record." + content: "If you don't see any fields in the above list, you probably need to create one in Salesforce's Object Manager. Only a field marked as an external id field can be used to identify a record.",🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 70-71: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 70-70:
Missing trailing comma
27-36: Consider rate limiting implicationsSince this component interacts with Salesforce's API, consider implementing rate limiting or documenting API limits to prevent hitting Salesforce's rate limits during bulk operations.
Would you like me to provide an implementation for rate limiting handling?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
[error] 70-71: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs
[failure] 70-70:
Missing trailing comma
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/actions/upsert-record/upsert-record.mjs (1)
1-23: LGTM! Well-structured component setup
The component metadata and props are well-organized, with good documentation links and proper dynamic property reloading for object types.
| async upsertRecord(sobjectName, { | ||
| externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, ...args | ||
| }) { | ||
| const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`; | ||
| return this.salesforce._makeRequest({ | ||
| url, | ||
| method: "PATCH", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add parameter validation and URL encoding
While the upsert implementation is correct, consider these safety improvements:
- Add parameter validation for
externalIdFieldNameandexternalIdValue - URL encode the
externalIdValueto handle special characters safely
async upsertRecord(sobjectName, {
externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, ...args
}) {
+ if (!externalIdFieldName || !externalIdValue) {
+ throw new Error("External ID field name and value are required");
+ }
- const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`;
+ const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${encodeURIComponent(externalIdValue)}`;
return this.salesforce._makeRequest({
url,
method: "PATCH",
...args,
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async upsertRecord(sobjectName, { | |
| externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${externalIdValue}`; | |
| return this.salesforce._makeRequest({ | |
| url, | |
| method: "PATCH", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async upsertRecord(sobjectName, { | |
| externalIdFieldName, externalIdValue, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| if (!externalIdFieldName || !externalIdValue) { | |
| throw new Error("External ID field name and value are required"); | |
| } | |
| const url = `${this.salesforce._sObjectTypeApiUrl(sobjectName)}/${externalIdFieldName}/${encodeURIComponent(externalIdValue)}`; | |
| return this.salesforce._makeRequest({ | |
| url, | |
| method: "PATCH", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ | ||
| const { | ||
| salesforce, | ||
| objectType, | ||
| getAdditionalFields: getData, | ||
| convertFieldsToProps, | ||
| docsInfo, | ||
| docsInfoExtId, | ||
| additionalFields, | ||
| externalIdFieldName, | ||
| externalIdValue, | ||
| updateOnly, | ||
| ...data | ||
| } = this; | ||
| /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ | ||
| const response = await this.upsertRecord(objectType, { | ||
| $, | ||
| externalIdFieldName, | ||
| externalIdValue, | ||
| params: { | ||
| updateOnly, | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| ...data, | ||
| ...getData(), | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${response.created | ||
| ? "created" | ||
| : "updated"} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`); | ||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and response validation
The run method should include proper error handling and response validation:
async run({ $ }) {
/* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */
const {
salesforce,
objectType,
getAdditionalFields: getData,
convertFieldsToProps,
docsInfo,
docsInfoExtId,
additionalFields,
externalIdFieldName,
externalIdValue,
updateOnly,
...data
} = this;
/* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */
+ try {
+ if (!objectType || !externalIdFieldName || !externalIdValue) {
+ throw new Error("Missing required fields: objectType, externalIdFieldName, or externalIdValue");
+ }
const response = await this.upsertRecord(objectType, {
$,
externalIdFieldName,
externalIdValue,
params: {
updateOnly,
},
data: {
...data,
...getData(),
},
});
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid response: missing record ID");
+ }
$.export("$summary", `Successfully ${response.created
? "created"
: "updated"} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to upsert ${objectType} record: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ | |
| const { | |
| salesforce, | |
| objectType, | |
| getAdditionalFields: getData, | |
| convertFieldsToProps, | |
| docsInfo, | |
| docsInfoExtId, | |
| additionalFields, | |
| externalIdFieldName, | |
| externalIdValue, | |
| updateOnly, | |
| ...data | |
| } = this; | |
| /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ | |
| const response = await this.upsertRecord(objectType, { | |
| $, | |
| externalIdFieldName, | |
| externalIdValue, | |
| params: { | |
| updateOnly, | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| ...data, | |
| ...getData(), | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${response.created | |
| ? "created" | |
| : "updated"} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ | |
| const { | |
| salesforce, | |
| objectType, | |
| getAdditionalFields: getData, | |
| convertFieldsToProps, | |
| docsInfo, | |
| docsInfoExtId, | |
| additionalFields, | |
| externalIdFieldName, | |
| externalIdValue, | |
| updateOnly, | |
| ...data | |
| } = this; | |
| /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ | |
| try { | |
| if (!objectType || !externalIdFieldName || !externalIdValue) { | |
| throw new Error("Missing required fields: objectType, externalIdFieldName, or externalIdValue"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.upsertRecord(objectType, { | |
| $, | |
| externalIdFieldName, | |
| externalIdValue, | |
| params: { | |
| updateOnly, | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| ...data, | |
| ...getData(), | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid response: missing record ID"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${response.created | |
| ? "created" | |
| : "updated"} ${objectType} record (ID: ${response.id})`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to upsert ${objectType} record: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
|
/approve |
|
/approve |
Closes #14812
Note: to validate this, you must create a field for an object in the Salesforce platform and mark it as an external ID field.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores